APA Membership Statistics

Year

Associates

Members

Fellows

Total

1892

31 1

31

1892

42 2

424

1893

(54)3

(54)

18945

(67)

(67)

1895

(78)

(78)

18966

(94)

(94)

18977

87

87

1898

111111

1899

113113

1900

127127

1901

127127

1902

127127

1903

135135

1904

(94)

(151)

1905

(168)

(168)

19068

(190)

(190)

1907

(209)

(209)

1908

209209

1909

(225)

(225)

1910

228

228

19119

(244)

(244)

1912

262

262

1913

271

271

1914

285

285

191510

291291

191611

308

30812

1917

336336

1918

367367

1919

372372

192013

393393

19211415

424

42416

1922

442442

192317

45718

45719

192420

464

46421

192522

471

471

1926

41

494

535

192723

92516

60824

192825

165534

699

1929

353540

893

1930

5715301,101

1931

7375301,267

1932

9855251,510

1933

1,1355351,670

1934

1,2245301,754

1935

1,2765421,818

1936

1, 431

556

1,987

1937

1,551

587

2,138

193826

1,715

603

2,318

193927

1,909

618

2,527

1940 

2,075 

664  

2,739 

 1941

2,254 

683 

2,937

 1942

2,518 

713  

3,231 

 1943

2,716 

760  

3,231 

 1944

2,948 

858  

3,806 

 1945

3,161 

1,012  

4,173 

194628

3,344  1,083 4,427 
1947 3,583  1,078 4,661 
1948 4,493  1,261 5,754 
1949 5,299  1,436 6,735 
1950 5,775  1,498 7,272 
1951 6,979  1,576 8,554 
1952 7,927  1,585 9,512 
1953 

9,233 

 

1,690 

10,903

195429 

10,567 

 

1,813 

12,380 

1955 

11,579 

 

1,896 

13,475 

1956 

12,503 

 

2,006 

14,509 

1957 

13,457 

 

2,088 

15,545 

1958 none 

14,474 

2,170 

16,644 

1959 744 

14,485 

2,219 

17,448

1960 

1,408 

14,569

2,238 

18,215 

1961 

2,033 

14,640

2,275 

18,948 

1962 

2,623 

14,931 

2,337 

19,891 

1963 

3,213 

15,342 

2,378 

20,933 

1964 

3,791 

15,865 

2,463 

22,119 

1965 

4,362 

16,664 

2,535 

23,561 

1966 

4,812 

17,095 

2,566 

24,473 

1967 

5,219 

17,955 

2,626 

25,800 

1968 

5,640 

18,889 

2,721 

27,250 

1969 

6,070 

19,909 

2,806 

28,785 

1970 

6,532

21,502 

2,805 

30,839 

1971 

6,611 

22,526 

2,848 

31,985

1972 

6,832 

23,870

2,927 

33,629

1973 

7,052 

25,243 

2,959

35,254 
1974 

7,357 

26,644 

2,999 

37,000 

1975 

7,795 

28,552 

3,064 

39,411 

1976 

8,278 

30,576 

3,174 

42,028 

1977 

8,658 

32,797 

3,195 

44,650 

1978 

8,817 

34,832 

3,242 

46,891 

1979 

8,909 

36,804 

3,333 

49,047 

1980 

8,865 

38,675 

3,393 

50,933 

1981 

8,706 

40,301 

3,433

52,440 

1982 

8,681 

42,071 

3,528 

54, 282 

1983 

8,600 

44,212 

3,590 

56,402 

1984 

8,539 

46,042 

3,641 

58,222 

1985 

8,511 

47,901 

3,719

60,131 

1986 

8,587 

50,727 

3,832 

63,146 

1987 

8,823 

52,584 

3,737 

65,144 

1988 

8,347 

54,644 

4,005 

66,996 

1989 

8,098 

56,226 

3,997 

68,321 

1990 

7,903 

58,311 

4,052 

70,266 

1991 

7,884 

60,259 

4,059 

72,202 

1992 

7,631 

60,892 

4,121 

72,644 

1993 

7,295

61,806

4,162 

73,263

1994 

7,532 

64,234

4,242 

76,008 

1995 

7,719 

67,063 

4,316 

79,098 

1996 

7,841 

69,335 

4,355 

81,531 

1997 

7,450 

70,587 

4,350 

82,387 

1998 

7,165 

71,364 

4,409 

82,938 

1999 

7,068 

72,064 

4,484 

83,617

2000 

6,732 

71,847 

4,517 

83,096 

200130
31
32 

7,618 76,660  4,547 88,825
2002 

7,507

77,316 

4,580 

89,403 

2003 

7,240 

77,938

4,597 

89,775 

2004 

7,144 

78,416 

4,642 

90,202 

2005 

7,056 

78,542

4,658 

90,256 

2006 

7,385 

79,158 

4,653 

91,196 

2007 

7,943 

79,407 

4,705 

92,055 

2008

8,318

79,152

4,852

92,322

20098,77578,6184,62692,019
20109,22377,5084,62691,306

1 Preliminary Meeting.
2 First Annual Meeting.
3 Figures in parentheses are estimates.
4 The first mention of membership appears in a tentative ad interim constitution adopted at the first annual meeting (1892) which reads: " The right of nomination for membership is reserved to the Council, the election to be made by the Association." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 7-8).

5 In the first constitution adopted at the third annual meeting (1894) no specific Article is concerned with membership. But, in Article II, which provides for a Council of six members with the President ex-officio, we find as one of its duties that they " shall nominate new members "and also that " the resolutions of the Council shall be brought before the Association and decided by a majority vote." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 8).

6 As early as 1896, one finds that (Lightner) Witmer proposed that "all names nominated by the Council, shall be presented to the Association at its opening meeting in written form or visibly displayed upon a blackboard, together with a statement of the contribution or contributions to psychology, in virtue of which the persons named are eligible to Membership, and that the final action upon such names shall be taken by the Association at the final business meeting." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 8).

7 Perhaps because of (Lightner) Witmer's motion the previous year, it was voted in 1897 "that nomination blanks be provided by the Secretary with spaces for the name, official position and publications of the candidate and the names of two proposers, members of the Association; such blanks to be filled in and sent to the Secretary before the meeting and to be read before the Association when the name of such candidate comes up for election." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 8).

8 Council decided in the future to define the qualifications and make them more difficult. This was accomplished in 1906 by a formal announcement of the Council to the Association of the principles which guided them in nominating or declining to nominate individuals proposed for Membership. "The Constitution reads that those are eligible for membership who are engaged in 'the advancement of Psychology as Science.' In interpreting the Constitution the Council has, historically and consistently, recognized two sorts of qualifications for membership: professional occupation in psychology and research. The Council now adheres to a somewhat strict interpretation of the former of these qualifications so that, in the absence of research, positions held in related branches such as philosophy and education, or temporary positions, such as assistantships in psychology, are not regarded as qualifying candidates for membership." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 9).

9 "The Council having for some years back experienced frequent difficulty in securing adequate information regarding applicants for membership in the Association made public the following announcement: The Council requests that all recommendations for membership in the Association submitted to the Secretary at least one month in advance of the time of election, and that these recommendations be accompanied by Statement of the candidate's professional position and by copies of published researches." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 9).

10 In 1915, at the end of this low period, (Charles) Judd questioned the Council's interpretation of a statement regarding requirements of candidates for admission to membership in the Association and moved that it be the sense of the Association that the statement appended to Article I of the Constitution defining 'temporary positions' should be interpreted to include under this head the position of instructor." The motion was carried and we see, for the first time, the Association as a whole, rather than the Council, initiating a definition of qualifications for membership. This motion defines an instructorship as a temporary position and hence, for a younger man, throws still greater emphasis on the question of publication. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 10).

11 In the next year (1916) the Council again initiates a move for greater standardization as follows: "A proposal for membership, signed by at least two members of the Association, must be submitted to the Secretary, for the Council at least one month in advance of the annual meeting. The proposal must be accompanied by (1) a statement of the candidate's professional position and degrees, naming the institutions by which and the dates when, conferred, and (2) by copies of his published researches. In the absence of acceptable publications of a psychological character, or a permanent position in psychology, the conditions of membership will not be regarded as having been fulfilled." This announcement merely still further defined Judd's motion of the year before and for the first time specifically mentions academic degrees. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 10).

12 In the same year (1916) the Council also announced that " Proposals to membership that are unfavorably acted upon by the Council must be renewed for action at a subsequent meeting." (Fernberger, 1933, p. 10).

13 In this year (1920) it was voted "that a committee of three, including the Secretary, be appointed by the President to revise the requirements for membership and to report at the next annual meeting of the Association." Boring was appointed chairman with Dunlap and Terman as the committee. It was also proposed and voted that this be referred to the new Committee, that foreign members be not elected to active membership but "that distinguished psychologists in foreign countries be elected, upon recommendation of the Council, corresponding members of the Association and that such corresponding members be not subject to the payment of dues." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 11).

14 In 1921 this committee reported and the report was adopted by the Association in part only. The committee recommended two grades of membership, Members and Fellows. The recommendation was for the creation of 100 Fellows within the membership of the Association and asked for a new committee to consider the mode of election of these Fellows, their qualifications, functions, etc. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 11).

15 But the first part of the report, which was adopted and became law, more fully and clearly defines qualifications for membership. In a preamble the committee states: "The Committee believes further that the qualifications should be formulated in accordance with the object of the Association, ' the advancement of psychology as a science ' as stated in the Constitution; and they believe that this end will be most readily secured by placing emphasis upon scientific publication. They believe further that the time has come to abandon professional position or title as a basis for election on account of the reason that the multiplication of special positions, especially in nonacademic fields of psychology, makes the interpretation of the significance of position impracticable." In order to enforce this point of view, the Association adopted the Committee's specific recommendations for qualifications for members the establishment of an 'associate' grade of membership and to report to the 1924 meeting with recommendations." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 11-12).

16 ..The Association adopted the Committee's specific recommendations for qualifications for membership which were "(1) acceptable published research of a psychological character and (2) of the degree of the Doctor of Philosophy, based in part on a psychological dissertation." The question of the degree may be waived by the council in special cases providing it states its reasons when making the nomination. And further "(3) it is also expected that the Council shall assure itself that the nominee is actively engaged in psychological work at the time of the nomination." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 12).

17 1924....At the meeting the year before it was decided that nominations must be made "not later than March 15th of the year in which the nomination is to be first acted upon." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 12).

18 1923...the Council shall have power to defer action upon such proposals for membership as it deems necessary providing, however, that the third annual meeting after the original receipt of the nomination papers, it ms decide either to present or not to present the candidate's name to the Association. A proposal for membership cannot be reviewed until two years have elapsed after the Council's action upon it." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 12).

19 1923...It was voted that a committee of three be appointed "to consider the advisability of the establishment of an 'associate' grade of membership and to report to the 1924 meeting with recommendations." Boring was appointed chairman of this committee with F. L. Wells and Hunter. The report, which was a lengthy one, was presented in 1924 and printed in the Proceedings. The committee "are unanimous in the opinion that the purposes of the Association will be served by the creation of a class of Associates " because the growth of psychology has "created distinct groups of persons engaged in psychological work of a scientific character at less advanced levels" so that the fundamental requirements of membership can no longer be met by this group. Hence the Committee proposes a class of Associates eligible under the following qualifications: "(1) any person devoting full time to work that is primarily psychological; (2) any person with the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, based in part upon a psychological dissertation and conferred by a graduate school of recognized standing, or (3) scientists, educators or distinguished persons, whom the Council may recommend for sufficient reason." (Fernberger, 1932, p. 12).

20 The exclusionary tendency that predominated the first two decades of the 20th Century was to eliminate from membership individuals who were not directly involved in psychological pursuits. The Definition of Psychology officially hinged on the terminology of the Associations Constitution as "The Advancement of Psychology as a Science," which was primarily that of academic psychology involved in research, primarily experimental research. In general, it was the individuals on the periphery of psychology who were eliminated, those with a non professional, amateur's interest in the field, and those primarily involved in philosophy. (Evans, 1992, p. 78).

21 The committee then further recommends certain methods of application of the change. The application for Associateship may be made by the candidate rather than by two proposers as for Membership. But two endorsers must be specified by the applicant with whom the Council may (and always did) communicate. The application must be received by October 1 instead of March 15 as for Members. The Council is to consider all applications for Associateship and recommend to the Association which elects. The Associates to have the right of the floor at the annual meetings and the right participate in the programs but are not entitled to hold office or to vote. Upon the recommendation of the Council and by the majority vote of the annual meeting an Associateship may be terminated. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 13).

22 The necessary by-laws and constitutional changes were passed for the first time in 1924 and received the necessary second passage in 1925. Immediately and at the same meeting these changes the by-laws became effective by the election of forty-five Associates. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 13).

23 The committee suggests a form by means of which Associates may apply for Membership. This is to be accomplished by having all Associates asked each year if they care to make application for Membership. The committee also suggested a similar form of application blank for both grades. The changes were passed in 1927 on its second reading. This change had the effect of still further raising the qualifications for Membership by defining a policy of the Council demanding at least two publications beyond the doctorate thesis. It makes the date of application for both grades uniform with a closing on March 15th. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 14).

24 The Council in 1927 were willing to recommend only a relatively few Associates for Membership inasmuch as they were not willing to construe graduate work as "devoting full time to professional work in psychology." Hence in this year a change was made in the by-laws which changed this qualification to read " who have had at least one full year of graduate work in psychology in a recognized graduate school or who at the time of application are devoting full time to professional or graduate work in psychology. " (Fernberger, 1932, p. 14).

25 ..in 1928 a new mechanism for handling nominations was approved by the Council. According to this new method, which is still in practice, the Secretary first reviews each nomination. For those cases where there is no question that the candidate is eligible for Associateship but not for Membership (and this includes the great majority of the cases) the Secretary himself approves the nomination and writes to so inform the candidate, telling him that if he objects to this ruling and insists upon being considered for Membership, that his case will be presented to the Council. For all other cases, those who seem to be eligible for Membership and those whom the Secretary considers are not qualified for Associateship, the former method of submitting transcripts for the consideration of the Council is followed. (Fernberger, 1932, p. 15).

26 1. The Association shall Consist of three classes of persons: first, Members, second, Associates and third, Honorary Members. 2. Members of the Association shall be persons who are primarily engaged in the advancement of psychology as a science...3. Associates shall be such other persons as are interested in the advancement of Psychology as a science and who desire affiliation with the Association for this reason...3 Honorary Members shall be persons, who having reached the age of seventy years and having been members for at least twenty years, request such status. (APA Yearbook, 1938, pgs. 14-15).

27 The Association shall consist of three classes of persons: first, Members, second, Associates and third, Life Members...4. Life Members shall be persons who, having reached the ages of seventy years and having been members of the association for at least twenty years, request such status. (APA Yearbook, 1939, pg. 21).

28 The association shall consist of three classes of members: Fellows, Associates and Life Members. 2. Fellows of the Association shall be persons who are primarily engaged in the advancement of psychology as a profession..(APA Yearbook, 1946-1947, p. 26).

29 1954, the Council formally requested the Policy and Planning board to study the standards for membership, which, at that time, were those set forth in article II of the original (1946) bylaws. These classes of Membership were defined as follows:

  • Fellow. Holder of Doctoral degree based in part of a dissertation psychological in nature, prior membership as an Associate and acceptable, published research beyond the dissertation or four years of acceptable professional experience. The nomination was made by a Division to the Board of Directors, which, if approved was recommended to the council.

  • Associate. Holder of a doctorate or completion of two years of graduate work in psychology, or completion of the year of graduate study and one year of professional experience; or that the individual be a distinguished person recommended by the board of directors.

  • Life Member. A fellow or and Associate for 25 years and attainment at age 65.

...As a result of its deliberations, the Policy and Planning board recommended to the Board of Directors that the categories be revised. After some years of debate, the Council approved three classes of membership: Fellow, member and Associate. On approval by the Membership, this change went into effect at the beginning of 1958. Standards for Fellow were strengthened by requiring the nominating division to furnish the Membership Committee with clear evidence of the candidate's unusual or outstanding accomplishment in Psychology. The new category of Member required the doctorate, thus preserving the time-honored criterion. The class of Associate was continued for subdoctoral Psychologist, but it was stipulated that when an Associate was awarded the doctorate, he or she would automatically be raised to member. The Life Member Category was dropped, but waiver of dues, when requested, for members over 65 years of age and with 25 years of membership were retained. Various types of affiliates, such as Student, Division and Foreign were recognized, but, as in 1945, they were not counted as members of the association. (Evans, 1992, p. 182-183).

30 Member: The minimum standard for election to Member status is receipt of the doctoral degree based in part on a psychological dissertation or based on other evidence of proficiency in psychological scholarship. The doctoral degree must be received from a program primarily psychological in content and must be conferred by a graduate or professional school that (a) is regionally accredited or (b) has achieved such accreditation within five years of the year the doctorate was granted, or (c) is a school of equivalent standing outside of the United states. All Members may vote and hold office in the association. (Directory, 2001, p. IX).

31 Associate Member: To become an Associate Member, an applicant must meet one of two sets of requirements: (a) must have completed two years of graduate work in psychology at a regionally accredited graduate or professional school or (b) must have received the master's degree in psychology from a regionally accredited graduate or professional school. Associate members initially may not vote or hold office in APA. After five consecutive years of membership, Associate members may vote. (Directory, 2001, p. IX).

32 Fellow: Qualified members, may, on nomination by an APA division and election by the Council of Representatives, become fellows of the APA. Candidates for Fellows status must previously have been members for at least one full year, have a doctoral degree in psychology and at least five years of acceptable experience beyond that degree, hold membership in the nominating division, and present evidence of unusual or outstanding contribution or performance in the field of psychology. Fellows may vote and hold office. (Directory, 2001, p. IX).

Bibliography

 

American Psychological Association. (1938). "Bylaws: Article I." American Psychological Association Yearbook: 1938 Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 14-15.

American Psychological Association. (1939). "Bylaws: Article I." American Psychological Association Yearbook: 1939 Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 21.

American Psychological Association. (1947). "Bylaws: Article II." American Psychological Association Yearbook: 1946-1947 Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 26-27.

American Psychological Association. (2001). Directory of the American Psychological Association: 2001 Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. IX.

Crawford, Meredith P. (1992) "Rapid Growth and Change." 100 Years: The American Psychological Association: A Historical Perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 182-183.

Evans, Rand B. (1992) "Growing Pains." 100 Years: The American Psychological Association: A Historical Perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 76-80.

Fernberger, Samuel W. (1932). History of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 7-15.

ADVERTISEMENT