Results 110 of 91 for ""peer review" advocacy"X
Refine Your Search
Refine Your SearchX
Results 110 of 91
Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Sort by:
  • 1.Peer Review
    APA advocacy efforts related to the process of peer review, ensuring that only those research proposals with the highest scientific merit receive funding from federal agencies.
    Web Page
  • 2.Archive — Peer Review
    The process of scientific peer review ensures that research proposals with the highest scientific merit receive funding from federal agencies.
    Web Page
  • 3.Behavioral Researchers Defend Peer Review and their Research
    Congressional members and staff alike were supportive of both the scientists and the NIH peer review process and provided some assurances that they would work to remove the language from the final legislation.
    Web Page (January 2005)
  • 4.APA Advocacy Issues
    APA's Government Relations offices work on issues such as aging; lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender concerns; disability; peer review; trauma, violence and abuse; veterans and military issues; and children and the media.
    Web Page
  • 5.Patrick v. Burget, 486 U.S. 94
    APA argued that resolution of these antitrust issues required an understanding of the prohealth and procompetitive benefits of peer review, but also the anticompetitive risks of unscrutinized interprofessional peer review.
    Amicus Brief (November 1987)
  • 6.Advocacy
    APA works closely with decision-makers on Capitol Hill and in federal agencies as they formulate legislation and regulations of interest to psychologists. APA Government Relations is comprised of advocacy staff across three APA directorates: Education, Public Interest and Science.
    Web Page
  • 7.Statement Before the House of Representatives Supporting Peer Review
    "The Neugebauer amendment is about exasperation with NIH research on non-humans — i.e., animals and birds — and targets a grant given to a respected research institution in my District."
    Legal/Government Document (June 2005)
  • 8.Science Integrity in Policymaking
    Efforts to educate members of Congress about the importance of the peer-review process and sexual behavior research appear to be having the intended effect, but science will continue to be politicized.
    Web Page
  • 9.Action Alert: Take Action to Protect Scientific Integrity
    A bill would have rescinded funds from grants examining different aspects of sexual development and behavior and informing public health interventions for HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.
    Web Page (September 2004)
  • 10.Coalition to Protect Research
    Science GRO response to congressional attacks on peer-reviewed research funded by NIH.
    Web Page (January 2009)
Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Sort by:
Results 110 of 91 for ""peer review" advocacy"X