Results 110 of 78 for ""peer review" advocacy"X
Results 110 of 78
Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Sort by:
  • 1.Peer Review
    APA advocacy efforts related to the process of peer review, ensuring that only those research proposals with the highest scientific merit receive funding from federal agencies.
    Web Page
  • 2.Archive — Peer Review
    The process of scientific peer review ensures that research proposals with the highest scientific merit receive funding from federal agencies.
    Web Page
  • 3.APA Advocacy Issues
    APA's Government Relations offices work on issues such as aging; lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender concerns; disability; peer review; trauma, violence and abuse; veterans and military issues; and children and the media.
    Web Page
  • 4.Behavioral Researchers Defend Peer Review and their Research
    Web Page
  • 5.Peer Review: When and How Will the NIH Process Change?
    Web Page
  • 6.Statement Before the House of Representatives Supporting Peer Review
    "The Neugebauer amendment is about exasperation with NIH research on non-humans — i.e., animals and birds — and targets a grant given to a respected research institution in my District."
    Testimony (June 2005)
  • 7.APA Science Policy News
    A newsletter covering issues such as appropriations to NSF, NIH and the VA; scientific peer review; and other research and behavioral science issues.
    Newsletter Homepage
  • 8.Science Integrity in Policymaking
    Efforts to educate members of Congress about the importance of the peer-review process and sexual behavior research appear to be having the intended effect, but science will continue to be politicized.
    Web Page
  • 9.APA Government Relations
    APA works closely with decision-makers on Capitol Hill and in federal agencies as they formulate legislation and regulations of interest to psychologists. APA Government Relations is comprised of advocacy staff across three APA directorates: Education, Public Interest and Science.
    Web Page
  • 10.Action Alert: Take Action to Protect Scientific Integrity
    A bill would have rescinded funds from grants examining different aspects of sexual development and behavior and informing public health interventions for HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.
    Web Page (September 2004)
Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Sort by:
ADVERTISEMENT
Results 110 of 78 for ""peer review" advocacy"X