CE Sponsor Approval System APA ONLINE HOME HOME SITE MAP CONTACT
EDUCATION DIRECTORATE HOMEPAGE
PRODUCTS HOME
SPONSOR APPROVAL SYSTEM

For Approved Sponsors
CE Calendar

CONTINUING EDUCATION IN PSYCHOLOGY
List of Independent Study Programs
Clinicians Research Digest Article and Exam Series
The Office of Continuing Education in Psychology




AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
APPROVAL OF SPONSORS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION
FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS:

Criteria and Procedures Manual

November 1996
(updated July 2002)



PREFACE

This 1996 Manual is a revision of the document APA Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists, approved by the American Psychological Association Council of Representatives in January 1987. Adopted by Council as APA policy at that time, the criteria and procedures in this document have been reviewed annually by the Continuing Education in Psychology Committee and the Board of Educational Affairs.

The Manual was updated to reflect changes in policies and procedures. The Criteria have not been revised. Please discard any previous versions of the Manual you already have.

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS




SECTION ONE


Introduction 

SECTION TWO


Criteria for Approval of Sponsors
Procedures for Application Review
Terms of Approval - Types of Committee Action

Procedures for Reconsideration and/or Formal Appeal of Adverse Decisions

Terms of Approval - Responsibilities of APA and Approved Sponsors

Changes in Approval Status
 


APPENDIX ONE
APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists

APPENDIX TWO
Guidelines for Specialty Changes

APPENDIX THREE
SAS Fee Structure

APPENDIX FOUR
Procedures for Reconsideration and Appeal of Adverse Decisions
 






APA APPROVAL OF SPONSORS OF
CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS:
1996 CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES MANUAL


SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

The American Psychological Association (APA), founded in 1892, is the largest and most prestigious psychological organization in the United States. The purpose of APA is to advance psychology as a science, as a profession, and as a means of promoting human welfare by:

  Promoting research in psychology and improving research methods and conditions;

Continually improving the qualifications and competence of psychologists through high standards of ethical conduct, education, and achievement;

Disseminating psychological knowledge through meetings, psychological journals, books, and special reports.

A. Background of the APA Sponsor Approval System (SAS)

As set forth in the APA Bylaws, APA recognizes the interest and the responsibility of psychologists to continue their educational and professional development beyond the level of graduate training. Because psychological knowledge and skills are ongoing, it is necessary to have a means of updating them through the process of continuing education (CE). The following definition of continuing education was developed by the Continuing Education in Psychology Committee and other governance groups within APA: "Continuing Education in Psychology (CEP) is an ongoing process consisting of formal learning activities that (1) are relevant to psychological practice, education and science, (2) enable psychologists to keep pace with emerging issues and technologies, and (3) allow psychologists to maintain, develop, and increase competencies in order to improve services to the public and enhance contributions to the profession." The Sponsor Approval System was created by APA to facilitate psychologists' access to quality CE programs that have come under careful review and subscribe to APA criteria as set forth in this manual.

APA's Sponsor Approval System:

1.
2.
3.

4.

5.
Encourages CE among psychologists;
Encourages the development of high-quality CE programs;
Offers psychologists access to CE programs offered by APA-approved sponsors;

Provides technical assistance and guidance to organizations in the development or improvement of existing CE programs;
Encourages the development of a network of CE sponsors for the overall enhancement of CE programs available nationwide to psychologists.

CE is not a substitute for the basic academic education needed for entry to the field of psychology, nor should it be the primary vehicle for career changes from one specialty area in psychology to another.

(For APA's policy on training for psychologists wishing to change their specialty, please see Appendix 2.)

Therefore, programs that cannot be considered continuing education are:

1.
Organized programs of study leading to a degree;

2.
Programs covered by APA's policy on psychologists wishing to change their specialty;

3.
Internship programs undertaken as part of 1 or 2 above.

B. Continuing Education in Psychology Committee: Structure and Function

The APA Continuing Education in Psychology Committee (hereinafter referred to as "CEPC" or the "Committee") reviews and approves organizations (e.g., universities, private clinics, professional associations, specialty societies, consulting firms, etc.) that offer continuing education programs for psychologists. The system is not designed to approve the individual offerings of sponsors. Approved sponsors have the responsibility for designing and scheduling programs in compliance with the CE-SAS criteria provided in this manual.

The Committee is responsible for reviewing and ruling on applications for approval. The Committee is composed of members appointed by the APA's Board of Educational Affairs. In appointing members, every attempt is made to select individuals who are expert in CE program planning, administration and evaluation, and who broadly represent the major fields of psychology, various geographic regions, and individual characteristics such as sex and ethnic or cultural identity. Nominations to the Committee are solicited openly by means of the regular APA nomination process. Membership on the Committee rotates so that at least two new members are appointed to the Committee each year.

CEPC meets twice a year, shortly after the deadlines for receipt of applications. In reviewing applicants and monitoring approved sponsors, the Committee is committed to following the guidelines as established in the APA Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education: Criteria and Procedures Manual. The Committee reports to the Board of Educational Affairs and submits annual reports of its activities. The work of the Committee in approving sponsors of CE is kept confidential except that (a) disclosure shall be made in instances in which APA is legally advised or required to disclose such information; (b) information on a specific sponsor may be made available to other accrediting agencies by which the sponsor has been approved or whose approval the sponsor is seeking; (c) APA's legal counsel may be requested to review application materials; and (d) approved confidential minutes of the Committee's meetings shall be available only to the Committee, the Board of Educational Affairs, the Executive Director of the Education Directorate, the APA Executive Officer, the CE Programs Office staff, and, in the case of an appeal, to the Board of Directors. The Committee reserves the right to seek expert advice and relevant information from other external sources when reviewing an application, provided that such advice is kept confidential by the Committee and the advisor and that there is no possible conflict of interest.

C. Home Study and Self-Managed CE Programming

Although most sponsors choose to offer programs such as workshops and seminars, a variety of CE experiences is encouraged. These might include home study and self-managed CE programming. Programs such as these increases the flexibility of CE and help to meet the needs of psychologists who do not have access to traditional CE learning experiences. They also offer cost-efficient and easily accessible continuing education without sacrificing quality.

Home study CE programming is a sponsor-created, standardized set of learning experiences with fixed content that individuals can participate in off-site, on their own time. Home study programs usually take the form of books, audiotapes, videotapes, CD-ROMs, and so on, accompanied by a test.

Because home study programs are to be used by the participant on an individual and independent basis, the standards for awarding credit are especially important. Specifically, home study programs must:

1.
Have a structured learning curriculum;

2.
Indicate the method used to determine the number of credit hours to be awarded and data to validate this method;

3.
Indicate the method used to ensure that the person to whom credit is awarded does the work.

Self-managed CE programming is an individualized program of learning that sponsors develop to meet the specific needs of a learner based on an assessment of the individual's professional strengths and weaknesses. The program may be on or off-site. For example, if a psychologist identifies a need for training in a particular area, he or she would locate a source for that training and develop a plan for acquiring the needed knowledge or skill, perhaps with the guidance and/or input of a mentor or counselor.

As with any other CE programming offered under the APA Sponsor Approval System, home study and self-managed CE programs must adhere to the standards set forth in Section 2, Criteria, Parts A through M of this manual.

 
SECTION 2

CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF SPONSORS OF CE FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS

In this section criteria are presented in three ways. Each is preceded by its general principle and may be followed by a discussion of points intended to help you when filling out the application form. Note that all criteria apply to various types of activities designated by you as approved CE activities, including workshops and seminars, as well as correspondence (via print or computer) learning. In some cases, we refer to nontraditional learning activities as home study or self-managed programs.

A Goals

PRINCIPLE

The objective of CE for psychologists is to facilitate the highest quality professional work, whether in clinical applications, teaching, consultation, or research. CE for psychologists should be designed to meet the specific needs of postgraduate professionals within the field.

CRITERION

A.1.
CE program goals of APA-approved sponsors must address the importance of psychologists' access to resources that:

a.

b.

c.


d.
May improve their competence in professionally relevant ways;

Make possible the acquisition of new skills and knowledge required to maintain competence;

Strengthen the habits of critical inquiry and balanced judgment that denote the professional and scientific person;

Acknowledge and recognize their specific CE needs.

B.  Administration

PRINCIPLE

Sound administration with psychologists' input is essential for maintaining high quality CE programs for psychologists.

CRITERIA

B.1.



B.2.


B.3.


B.4.


B.5.



B.6.

Psychologists must provide direct input and be involved in all phases of the decision-making and program-planning process for the activities you offer to psychologists for credit.

You must have a clearly designated administrator of your program.


You must specifically indicate where CE programming fits in the overall administrative structure of the organization, if applicable.

You must have a mechanism or procedures to maintain current and continuing awareness of and adherence to APA CE policies and principles.

If offering home study programs or activities, you must have sufficient staff resources to fulfill your obligations to users of such programs. You should carefully monitor these activities to ensure educational effectiveness and consistency.

If an APA-approved sponsor has branches or subsidiaries and wishes to offer CE credit for psychologists through the branch or subsidiary, complete oversight and administration of the program must come through the parent, or approved, organization. The approved sponsor must be involved fully in the planning and implementation of CE programs and must assume full responsibility for these programs. If the above conditions do not apply, the branch or subsidiary must submit a separate application to APA for approval as a continuing education sponsor or must establish a co-sponsor relationship with the parent, or approved, organization.

DISCUSSION

Psychologists can provide direct input and be involved in all phases of the decision making and program planning processes through their representation on advisory boards, CE committees, or any body with the responsibility of determining the content and structure of continuing education activities.

Continued administrative support is essential for a program to remain in compliance with the APA Sponsor Approval System. Although the person responsible for the administration of the CE program need not be a psychologist, he or she must be knowledgeable regarding the Sponsor Approval System criteria and procedures. You must ensure this continuity throughout administrative staff changes. For example, members of your organization's CE Committee could serve staggered terms, or you could develop a "how-to" booklet with policies and procedures written down and readily available to pass on to new personnel.

Home study programs present a special administrative challenge, since materials must be developed, processed, reproduced, and distributed; in addition, procedures for scoring, notification, and record-keeping must be established and maintained. Approved sponsors of home study programs need adequate administrative staff resources to develop, implement, and maintain appropriate procedures and records.


C.  Co-sponsorship

PRINCIPLE

Co-sponsorship occurs when an APA-approved sponsor maintains full responsibility for a continuing education program, while joining with one or more organizations to offer CE activities leading to CE credit for psychologists.

CRITERIA

C.1.



C.2.



C.3.

Co-sponsorship is appropriate when it enables organizations to share financial, administrative, instructional, and other resources in a combined effort to offer high quality continuing education.

As an APA-approved sponsor, you must assume the same responsibilities and liabilities when co-sponsoring an activity as if you were the sole sponsor. Co-sponsored programs must fulfill your CE objectives and meet all criteria as set forth in this manual.

The APA-approved sponsor must have a prior agreement with the co-sponsor, in writing, that includes:

a.


b.



c.


d.

Clarification of responsibilities of each organization, including financial, administrative, instructional, and others;

Involvement of the approved sponsor in all aspects of program planning. A co-sponsorship relationship must be established prior to or during the planning stages of an activity at a point where contributions and changes can still be made.

The approved sponsor must ensure that the Ethical Principles of Psychologists are upheld.

In cases where each organization is APA-approved, clarification of which organization will accept and maintain responsibility for the activity.

DISCUSSION

Co-sponsorship is the act of mutually planning an activity, not to be construed as lending or transferring approval status. It does not permit the APA-approved sponsor to act as an approval body by reviewing a program or organization and then stating that it is, in turn, approved by APA. Note that co-sponsorship carries with it the same responsibilities and liabilities for the APA-approved sponsor as preparing a program alone. Co-sponsored programs should fulfill the CE objectives of the approved sponsor.


D.  Budget and Resources

PRINCIPLE

Sound financial planning is essential to the development, administration, and improvement of CE programs. Sufficient resources must be available to provide adequately for quality CE programs.

CRITERIA

D.1.

D.2.

You must have documented sources of financial support for the CE program.

Your budget and resources must be sufficient to meet all financial obligations associated with the program offerings. Resources must be adequate to support both direct and indirect program costs, including operational and nonoperational expenses as well as current and expected financial liabilities.


E.  Facilities

PRINCIPLE

An effective CE program requires adequate facilities and materials.

CRITERIA

E.1.



E.2.



E.3.

Your facilities must provide appropriate space for the kind of educational methodology used and be private enough to safeguard confidentiality of case material or work samples.

Facilities are expected to accommodate and be accessible to persons who are physically challenged. This includes the room in which the activity is taking place, restrooms, parking spaces, overnight rooms, and meeting rooms.

For home study programs, prospective users should be advised of any special equipment or materials they will need to provide.

DISCUSSION

For home study programs using technological media for learning, an audiotape-base program can reasonably be assumed to require the use of an audiotape player. The same can be said for video or computer activities. If, however, special equipment or software will be needed which cannot reasonably be inferred from the promotional material, the sponsor should clearly indicate what equipment, supplies or materials are needed.


F.

Program Selection and Development

PRINCIPLE

CE offerings for psychologists, and educational objectives, should be based on the interests and needs that have been identified through solid assessment procedures.

CRITERIA

F.1.


F.2.

F.3.

You must have methods for determining psychologists' learning needs, interests, and objectives.

You must be able to describe the basis on which program topics are chosen.

You must incorporate the results of participants' evaluations from previously offered activities into the planning process for future program offerings.

DISCUSSION

You must be able to show how CE programs relate to identified needs and interests in order to be approved as a CE sponsor. Educational needs and interests refer to any type of knowledge, skill or attitude that psychologists wish to or should develop, acquire or maintain.

In addition to your own perception of need, the programs you choose to offer will be enhanced when different sources of information are used, including:

1.


2.



3.

4.

5

A review of evaluation data (participant ratings) from previous similar CE activities, when available;

A survey of learning needs and interests from different sources (e.g., a random sample of psychologists, intended participants, experts in specialty areas, consumers of psychological services, instructors);

A search of the current literature;

A survey of issues and concerns of experts in a particular field; and

Suggestions and feedback from administrators, supervisors, and patients.

We encourage you to identify a target audience of participants who will benefit from the program being planned. Depending on the goals and content of the activity, the target audience can be defined in terms of individuals' current level of knowledge or skill in the subject matter, their past professional experience, methods of learning, and objectives in acquiring skills through the program.


G.

Instructional Personnel

PRINCIPLE

The quality and value of CE programs depend in large part on the instructor's expertise, competence in subject matter, and ability to facilitate learning.

CRITERIA

G.1

G.2.

G.3.



G.4.

Instructors must be competent and expert in the area they will teach.

Teaching ability must be a primary prerequisite for selecting CE instructors.

You must have some methods for monitoring and rating the instructors' levels of knowledge and ability to teach, such as internal evaluations and satisfaction questionnaires.

Home study program materials must be prepared by qualified individuals, including content and test-preparation experts.

DISCUSSION

Instructors' qualifications may be indicated by advanced degrees in psychology from a regionally accredited institution or specialized knowledge in a particular area. Some methods of determining instructors' teaching abilities include review of records of previous teaching experiences, evaluation forms from previous teaching positions, personal knowledge of the instructor's teaching ability, and references.

It is not a requirement that all instructors be PhD-level psychologists; however, you must be assured of the expertise of the instructor, regardless of whether he or she is a psychologist.

The content materials on which a home study program is based should be prepared with the input of psychologists. In cases where a written publication is to be used for home study, the content should be reviewed by a psychologist to assure its appropriateness for postdoctoral level individuals. If testing materials are not prepared by a psychologist, they should at least be reviewed by a psychologist.


H.

Curriculum Content

PRINCIPLE

Effective CE programs are up to date with respect to the topics and the empirical, theoretical and practice literature, use current data, and address predetermined educational objectives using teaching methods and materials appropriate to the subject matter.

CRITERIA

H.1


H.2.

H.3.



H.4.

CE programs must be relevant to psychological practice, theory, and method for doctoral-level psychologists.

CE programs for psychologists must have educational objectives.

CE programs for psychologists must be long enough to explore one subject or a closely related group of subjects in reasonable depth, but they must not be less than one full hour.

For home study programs, outcomes should be specified in terms of performance expected on the test instrument.

DISCUSSION

The term "continuing education," as it is defined in this manual, refers to education and training experiences "designed to provide or update knowledge and skills above the doctoral level." "Above the doctoral level" refers to the particular knowledge and skill level of the individual attending a program, not necessarily the level of the material being presented. According to this interpretation, the overriding consideration is whether programs offered for CE credit provide psychologists who have already obtained their doctorate with an opportunity to improve their knowledge and skills in areas relevant to their profession.

Every CE activity offered for credit, regardless of its length, must have clearly defined educational objectives. You must define carefully what will be taught and, ideally, what the participant is expected to learn as a result of attending the program, and this information must be made available to participants before they enroll. The purpose of developing educational objectives is not only to provide potential participants with information to use in selecting programs, but also to provide a set of criteria for you to use in assessing whether the goals you have established for your program have been achieved.

Your CE activities should deal with subject matter that is relevant and generally recognized within psychology. Claims made that imply new, innovative, and/or breakthrough types of findings may require substantiation via empirical data.

Often, longer programs that span several months and involve supervision are offered. In order for credit to be granted for the supervision component, the supervised activity must be a natural extension and integral part of the structured educational enterprise that, in its entirety, meets all other criteria for activities offered for credit. That is, it must have predetermined and specific educational objectives, measures to evaluate participant learning and satisfaction, and so forth. Free-standing supervision, which involves an open-ended approach, flexible agenda, and case discussions, would not meet the requirements for CE credit.



I. 

Program Evaluation

PRINCIPLE

Participants' evaluation of CE activities (1) provide the workshop leader or presenter with prompt feedback on how well he or she has accomplished his or her objective of teaching participants new or additional skills and knowledge and (2) provide data for your organization's use in planning future programs or improving current ones.

CRITERIA

I.1.





I.2.


I.3.












I.4.


I.5.



I .6.

You are required to have a procedure that assesses the participants' satisfaction with the overall program and their degree of perceived (self report) and/or achieved (objective) learning relative to the program's specific educational objectives. This procedure, which normally, but not necessarily, will take the form of a written rating, must be a part of each activity for which CE credit for psychologists will be awarded.

We encourage you to have all participants (not just psychologists) provide this feedback to increase the validity of the results.

At a minimum, you should obtain feedback on participant satisfaction in the following areas:

a.



b.

c.


d.

The quality of instruction and teaching ability (e.g., did the instructor present material in a clear and orderly fashion, gear material to a level appropriate to the audience, respond to questions and needs of the audience, maintain interest?);

The instructor's level of knowledge and expertise;

The usefulness of the program content for meeting each of the program's stated educational objectives;

The adequacy of the physical facilities (e.g., comfort, accessibility, space, visual and auditory supports).

You must document and use the results of the evaluation process to modify current programs and plan future ones.

You must be able to describe how the results of your evaluation procedures are used to modify current programs and plan future ones (see Section F, Program Selection and Development).

You must use a method that assures successful evaluation of home study programs.

a.


b.

Objective measures of learning (rather than self report), designed specifically for each home study activity, are required for all home study programs.

Although not recommended for in-person activities, a pass/fail determination is required of home study programs where there is no actual contact between instructor and participant.

DISCUSSION

Individuals who attend CE activities usually do so at substantial expense either to themselves or to their employers; such participants are usually highly motivated and have high expectations of the practical nature of what they learn. You will want to obtain data, both subjective and objective, on whether these expectations are being met by the CE activity being evaluated.

We encourage you to obtain data on the effectiveness of teaching strategies and communication, the instructor's ability to maintain participants' attention and interest, and the usefulness of the information presented. Such data are particularly valuable in evaluating programs and activities that will be repeated at future dates and for additional audiences.

CE activities may or may not require objective measures of learning. However, you are encouraged to obtain data on the content areas learned by participants as a way of determining the effectiveness of a program.


J.

Standards for Awarding Credit

PRINCIPLE

The awarding of CE credit is based on participation in an activity that meets the criteria for activities as outlined in this manual.

CRITERIA

J.1

J.2.

J.3


J.4


J.5.



J.6.




J.7


J.8.




J.9.


J.10.

You must give participants documentation that states the number of CE credits earned.

Credit must be awarded in units of whole or half-hours.

One credit is awarded for each hour of the CE activity in which learning actually takes place. Credit must not be awarded for lunch hours, breaks longer than 15 minutes, etc.

The statement of APA approval (see page 15) and the name of the activity must appear on such documentation.

You must be able to verify the awarding of CE credit to participants and provide this verification to individuals who request it for at least three years after completion of the activity.

You must require participants to attend 100% of activities that are short term (less than a week) if the components of the activity run consecutively (i.e., one hour or one day after another). For long-term activities in which components do not take place consecutively, at least 80% attendance is required for credit.

Variable credits, depending on the percentage of attendance, may not be offered (i.e., if an activity is 6 hours in length, all credits awarded must be for full 6-hour attendance).

For home study activities, for which actual contact hours are difficult to determine, you need to specify the method used for determining the number of CE credits to be awarded for successful completion. The method used has to be consistent from program to program so that a uniform measure of CE credit is applied.

If you offer home-study activities, you should make every effort to ensure that the individual returning the materials for credit is the person who actually completed the work.

It is important that you provide concise information to users of home study programs indicating what the requirements are for successful completion of the CE program and subsequent awarding of credit.

DISCUSSION

You must develop a consistent policy regarding what constitutes full attendance at your CE activities. This policy must ensure compliance with other APA criteria regarding CE activities. For extended activities in which 80% attendance is required, participants should be asked to perform a make-up task designed by the instructor to cover the material that was missed.


K.

Ethics

PRINCIPLE

CE activities and affairs associated with CE programming should conform to the highest ethical standards available to psychologists.

CRITERIA

K.1.



K.2.



K.3.



K.4.


K.5.




K.6.


K.7.

You must conduct and promote CE activities following the principles set forth in APA's Ethical Principles of Psychologists as they apply to the conduct of CE activities (see Appendix 1).

Any demonstrations or procedures carried out by instructors and participants must conform to the highest ethical and professional standards as currently established by APA's Ethical Principles of Psychologists.

Claims made that imply new, innovative, or breakthrough types of findings should be defined as such to potential participants and may require substantiation via empirical data.

You cannot discriminate when hiring staff, selecting participants, or selecting faculty.


You must maintain confidentiality regarding instructional materials and participant disclosure. When applicable, you should explicitly state at the beginning of the program that confidential material may be discussed and review with the participants the limits of that confidentiality.

If any activities are potentially stressful or upsetting to participants (as far as most psychologists can predict), you must inform participants before they enroll or attend.

You must develop written procedures for dealing with participant complaints in a reasonable, ethical and timely fashion. It is not necessary to include these procedures in promotional materials. For samples of such procedures, contact the CE Programs office.


L.

Promotion and Advertising of Programs

PRINCIPLE

CE promotional materials must demonstrate careful consideration of ethical principles (e.g., content of presentation, credentials of presenters, facilities, conduct of the activity, etc.).

CRITERIA

L.1.

Participants must have access to the following information prior to enrolling:

a.

b.


c.

d.


e.


f.

Educational objectives (see Discussion, Section H, Curriculum Content);

Participants for whom the activity is designed and skill level for which the activity is appropriate;

Schedule and format (including starting and ending hours);

Cost of the activity, the refund/cancellation policy and any additional fees or expenses;

Faculty credentials, including at a minimum the highest earned relevant professional degree and current professional positions;

The number of CE credits offered for each activity.

Although this information must be made available to participants before they register for an activity (e.g., in a brochure or descriptive document), it does not have to be included in all promotional materials. However, the means of obtaining this information from you must be clear.

L.2.

If you wish to mention your relationship to APA in promotional materials such as ads, brochures, and announcements, only the following statement may be used:

"(Your name) is approved by the American Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. (Your name) maintains responsibility for the program."

This statement, when used, must appear in its entirety. The only time a shortened statement may be used is when the full statement of approval is used elsewhere in the same promotional piece. An example of a shortened statement that may be used if the full statement appears elsewhere is as follows:




L.3.







L.4.


"CE Credits for Psychologists"


If an activity is co-sponsored, promotional materials and documentation of credit/attendance must clearly indicate which organization is accepting the responsibilities for upholding APA criteria, as in the following example:

"
This program is co-sponsored by (Your name) and (Name of "partner" sponsor). (Your name) is approved by the American Psychological Association to offer continuing education for psychologists. (Your name) maintains responsibility for the program."

If you have been approved by other bodies in addition to APA you may, under certain conditions, combine APA's approval statement with that of ACCME, NBCC, and so on. The following conditions must be met:

a.

b.

c.
The statement must indicate that your organization is approved, not the activity.

The statement that your organization maintains responsibility for the program must be present.

The term "accredited" (if used by other organizations) should either be replaced by or accompanied by the term "approved."

Example: "As an organization approved by the ACCME, the American Psychological Association, the Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board (social workers), and the National Board of Certified Counselors, (your name) is offering this activity for 4 hours of continuing education credit. (Your name) maintains responsibility for the program."

L.5.



L.6.



L.7.
Do not use the term "CEU" (continuing education unit) to refer to credits earned from APA-approved organizations. CE credit for psychologists is granted on a one credit per one contact hour basis; the CEU, on the other hand, grants one CEU for every ten contact hours.

Do not use the terms "accredit" or "accreditation" in reference to the APA Sponsor Approval System, because it creates confusion with APA's Accreditation program for graduate programs and internships.

You may not use the APA logo when advertising your programs or on documentation of attendance.

M. Home Study Programs

PRINCIPLE

Home study is an alternative method to face-to-face contact for the delivery of postdoctoral CE for psychologists. The sponsor must maintain high standards in the design of home study materials to optimize quality educational materials for psychologists engaging in continuing education through this method of delivery.

CRITERIA

M.1. As an APA-approved sponsor you must ensure that each home study program has, at a minimum, all of the following components:

a.

b.



c.
A structured learning curriculum or syllabus;

An objective assessment of content learning, including a specified criterion level of performance (e.g., 75%), a means by which tests are scored, and a reasonable time period within which tests will be scored;

Validity data, including:
  i.
ii.
iii.

iv.
A method of determining credit hours (e.g., page count)
Evidence documenting a rationale for this method (e.g., field trial)
For objective measures of learning (e.g., multiple choice, true/false), sufficient length of testing instruments.
For essay measures, indication of content to be included and metric for rating this (e.g., grading grid)
  d. A method for ensuring that the individual participated in the continuing education activity and that all work was done by the person awarded the credit.

M.2. Regarding on-line home study offerings, there will be:

a.

b.
A sufficient user ID system in place, and

A mechanism for safeguarding the security of psychologically-sensitive materials.

 
PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION REVIEW


A. Eligibility to Apply

The following types of organizations are encouraged to apply for approval: APA divisions, state or regional psychological associations, departments of psychology or other divisions within universities or colleges, private educational organizations, professional societies or associations, hospitals, medical schools, mental health centers, and government agencies. It may be appropriate for other organizations to apply as well.

B. How to Apply

In order to obtain APA-approval as a sponsor of CE for psychologists, organizations must submit an application for review by the Committee. The original application and supporting materials must be accompanied by three collated copies of the application and all supporting materials and a nonrefundable check covering the appropriate application fee. Applicants who would like assistance in completing the application may write or call the APA Sponsor Approval System. The application and all subsequent communications should be forwarded to the Sponsor Approval System, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. For costs involved in applying for and maintaining APA approval see Appendix 3, or call the APA Sponsor Approval System at 202-336-5990. Sponsor Approval System staff will also review draft applications and provide feedback to applicants assuming that a draft is received at least one month in advance of the application deadline.

C. When to Apply

The Committee reviews applications for approval twice a year. Approval will be based on the extent to which the applicant is judged to meet the SAS criteria specified in Section 2 of this document.

In addition to the information and materials supplied by the applicant, the Committee reserves the right to consult other sources of information as appropriate. Under special circumstances, the Committee may request a site visit, with the cost of this visit borne by the Sponsor.

TYPES OF COMMITTEE ACTION


A. 2 Year Preliminary Approval

2 Year Preliminary Approval is granted to first time applicants who minimally meet the SAS criteria as outlined in Section 2 of this manual. At the end of the preliminary approval period, sponsors must reapply for continuation of approval by submitting a full application. During the preliminary approval period, sponsors will be required to address any shortcomings noted by the Committee at the time preliminary approval was granted. At the end of the 2 Year Preliminary Approval period, sponsors apply for a five-year period of time.


B. 5 Year Full Approval

5 Year Full Approval is granted to applicants who have successfully completed a 2 Year Preliminary Approval period and submitted an application that satisfactorily addresses shortcomings noted by the Committee at the time of preliminary approval. A full renewal application must be submitted at the end of the five-year period.

C. Preliminary or Full Approval with Inquiry

Inquiry may be made if the Committee requires timely clarification of an apparent misuse or misunderstanding of one or more points of the criteria. At the time of the Review Report, staff, upon direction from the Committee, makes inquiry into the suspected criteria violation or concern and asks for a response within a specific time frame (usually 30 days). Staff then reviews the response for its thoroughness in addressing and/or correcting the concern(s) and determines whether the response is sufficient. If staff deems the response insufficient in addressing the concerns, the materials will be forwarded to the ad hoc complaint advisors, who will determine if probation should be put into effect. If the sponsor does not respond to the inquiry by the specified deadline, it will be placed on administrative probation for 30 days, after which termination of approval will occur if a response is not forthcoming.

D. 1 Year Conditional Approval

1 Year Conditional approval may be granted to applicants who have completed, at a minimum, a 2 Year Preliminary Approval period but do not meet all of the SAS criteria as stated in Section 2 of this manual. Conditional approval is for a period of one year, at which time sponsors must reapply with attention given to the specific areas of concern indicated by the Committee at the time of conditional approval. Conditionally approved sponsors retain the benefits, rights, and responsibilities of preliminary or fully approved sponsors.

Conditional approval may be granted at any point in the approval cycle after the initial 2 Year Preliminary Approval is completed (i.e., at any time a reapplication is required, either after the initial two-year period or after a five-year approval period). After one year of conditional approval, a second conditional year can be granted if issues of concern remain. Conditional approval may be granted only twice consecutively for any approval cycle. Should the sponsor not adequately remedy any areas of concern after the second conditional year of approval, further approval will be denied.

E. Deferral

The Committee may defer action on an application if more information is needed to allow the Committee to make a decision about the organization's capability to offer CE for psychologists in compliance with the SAS criteria. The applicant will receive a request for more information by a specified deadline prior to the next regularly scheduled Committee meeting.

The purpose of a deferral is to allow the Committee to request clarification on procedures that were in place at the time of the application. New procedures adopted subsequent to a deferral will not be considered during the Committee's review of the response to deferral. If the requested information is not forthcoming by the next meeting of the Committee, the application will be considered inactive. Any request for approval at a later time will require a completely new application. Only applications submitted by new applicants may be deferred.

F. Denial

Applicants who do not provide adequate evidence of meeting the SAS criteria will not be approved. The reasons for denial will be specified in a written report to the applicant. A decision to deny can be handed down (a) at initial application review; (b) at application review after preliminary approval; (c) at application review after first conditional approval; (d) at application review after second conditional approval; and (e) at review after any five-year full approval. Applicants denied approval may reapply in one-year's time or request reconsideration or formal appeal of the adverse decision (see
Procedures for Reconsideration and/or Formal Appeal, below).

 
PROCEDURES FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR FORMAL APPEAL
OF ADVERSE DECISIONS


The following decisions made by the Committee are considered adverse decisions for which the sponsor/applicant may request reconsideration or formally appeal:

1. Denial
2. Probation
3. Termination of approval

On notification of any of the above decisions, approved sponsors may either ask for reconsideration of the decision or they may formally appeal the decision. Although reconsideration is generally the first recourse by sponsors receiving adverse decisions because there is no cost involved to the applicant, it is important to note that this step can be bypassed if the sponsor wishes to lodge a formal appeal immediately.

When making a decision between reconsideration and appeal, the sponsor should consider that costs incurred as a result of the appeal hearing will be borne in part by the applicant. If reconsideration is requested and the Committee upholds its adverse decision, the sponsor may then formally appeal the decision reached on reconsideration. Following are the instructions for requesting reconsideration and making a formal appeal.

A. Reconsideration

If an applicant wishes the Committee to reconsider an adverse decision, a written request must be received by the APA Sponsor Approval System within 30 days of receipt of notification of the decision. The applicant will have the opportunity to clarify any issue raised in the notification letter. There is no charge or fee for reconsideration.

B. Formal Appeal

Applicants wishing to formally appeal an adverse decision must notify the APA Sponsor Approval System in writing within 30 days of receipt of notification of the decision. Costs incurred as a result of the appeal hearing will be borne in part by the applicant.

The document Procedures for Reconsideration and Appeal of Adverse Decisions is included as an appendix to this Manual, and is also mailed with each notification of an adverse decision.

 
TERMS OF APPROVAL


A. Responsibilities of the Approved Sponsor to APA

1. APA-approved sponsors must conform to the APA CE sponsor approval criteria.

Approved sponsors agree to conduct CE activities in conformance with the SAS criteria set forth in Section 2 of this document. Sponsors in violation of the criteria will be subject to probation or termination of approval.

2. Sponsors must pay scheduled fees (see Appendix 3 for amounts and schedule of payment):

a.

b.

c.
Application review fee: nonrefundable, due with any application requiring Committee review.

Recognition fee: one time only as long as approval is continuous; due on preliminary approval.

Annual fee: due for each year of approval.

Nonpayment of fees will result in probation and, ultimately, in termination of approval. New applications will not be reviewed or activated until appropriate fees are paid.

3. Sponsors must submit an annual Activity Summary Form.

The Activity Summary Form is sent at the same time as the annual fee invoice in years in which a renewal application is not due. The Activity Summary Form lists all activities offered by the sponsor in the previous year and includes promotional pieces for each corresponding program. Sponsors who have not offered any programs are still required to return the form.

4. Sponsors must submit Status Reports.

APA-approved sponsors must submit Status Reports that respond to issues raised in the review report. "Status Report Requirements" will be mailed approximately two months prior to the Status Report submission deadline. Status Reports are due one year after approval for two-year and five-year approvals. Conditionally approved sponsors will not submit Status Reports because they will be reapplying at the end of one year. Sponsors will be notified in advance of the due date. Failure to submit Status Reports will result in probation and, ultimately, in termination of approval.

B. Responsibilities of APA to the Approved Sponsor

1. APA-approved sponsors may list programs in the "CE Calendar."

A calendar of CE activities offered by approved sponsors is listed on the APA website. To list offerings in the "CE Calendar," an approved sponsor must submit a "CE Calendar Listing Form" to the Sponsor Approval System as far in advance of the offering as possible.

2.

3.
APA-approved sponsors are entitled to reduced advertising rates in the APA Monitor.

APA-approved sponsors will receive a complimentary subscription to the APA Monitor, a monthly publication for APA members.


 
CHANGES IN APPROVAL STATUS


A. APA-Approved Sponsors May Be Reassessed

Approved sponsors may be reassessed under the following circumstances:

1.


2.

3.


4.
Failure to comply with the terms of approval outlined in the Terms of Approval of this manual, including the Ethical Principles of Psychologists.

Substantial changes in a sponsor's goals, activities or administration.

Indications that a sponsor's CE activities fail to meet the requirements of the SAS criteria outlined in Section 2 of this manual.

The planning, evaluation and other procedures followed by the sponsor are substantially inconsistent with those described in the sponsor's application and/or the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists.

Under any of these circumstances, the sponsor may be reevaluated and a decision as to continuation of approval will be made. Reassessment may result in probation or termination of approval.


B. APA-Approved Sponsors May Request Nonactive Status

When no CE activities are planned for a period of one year, fully approved sponsors may request nonactive status for that year. The request must be made in writing prior to the time that nonactive status will begin, and will not be granted retroactively.

Terms of nonactive status are as follows:

1.

2.

3.







4.


5.

6.
The annual fee billed during the inactive year will be one half of the amount required for active status.

The name of the organization will remain in the APA master listing of APA-approved sponsors.

Nonactive sponsors may not

a.

b.

c.
use the statement of APA approval;

list any programs in the CE Calendar;

obtain reduced advertising rates in the APA Monitor.

If the sponsor wishes to regain active status at any time prior to the end of one year, the balance of the full annual fee for active status must be paid before action may be taken.

Nonactive status will not extend the period of approval.

Sponsors granted nonactive status for a particular year may offer full credit for activities that began when the sponsor was active and conclude in the inactive year. Sponsors must clearly indicate these circumstances when preparing Status Reports for the inactive year.

C. APA-Approved Sponsors May be Placed on Probation

If an approved sponsor's activities do not meet the criteria as outlined in Section 2 of this manual, or if a sponsor fails to comply with the Terms of Approval as outlined in this manual, the sponsor may be placed on probation. The reasons for and length of the probationary period will be outlined in writing to the sponsor. Although retaining approval status, the sponsor's activities will be closely monitored by the Committee during this period.

At the end of the period of probation, the sponsor must provide documentation of compliance with the issues raised in the notification-of-probation letter. If such documentation is not provided, approval will be terminated. If approval is terminated, the sponsor must submit a new application in order to regain approval status. Probation is considered an adverse decision and may be reconsidered and/or formally appealed.

D. APA-Approved Sponsors May Not Withdraw Their Approval if a Complaint Against Them is Pending

APA has an established grievance procedure that includes informing approved sponsors when a complaint is brought against them by another organization or individual. Once the sponsor has been informed of the complaint, it cannot withdraw from the Sponsor Approval System until the complaint has been resolved.
 


  APPENDIX ONE


APA ETHICAL PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS



The 2002 Ethics Code went into effect June 1, 2003. View the 2002 Code




Adopted by the Council of Representatives
January 23-25, 1976
APPENDIX TWO



POLICY ON TRAINING FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS WISHING
TO CHANGE THEIR SPECIALTY


Inasmuch as it is to the advantage of psychology and society to provide for a change of specialty or the development of dual specialties so as to encourage unique contributions that might be made by psychologists with broadly diversified backgrounds, Council adopts the following as official policy of APA.
  • We strongly urge Psychology Departments currently engaged in doctoral training to offer training for individuals, already holding the doctoral degree in psychology, who wish to change their specialty. Such programs should be individualized, since background and career objectives vary greatly. It is desirable that financial assistance be made available to students in such programs.

  • Programs engaging in such training should declare so publicly and include a statement to that effect as a formal part of their program description and/or their application for accreditation.

  • Psychologists seeking to change their specialty should take training in a program of the highest quality, and, where appropriate, exemplified by the doctoral training programs and internships accredited by the APA.

  • With respect to subject matter and professional skills, psychologists taking such training must meet all requirements of doctoral training in the new psychological specialty, being given due credit for relevant course work or requirements they have previously satisfied.

  • It must be stressed, however, that merely taking an internship or acquiring experience in a practicum setting is not, for example, considered adequate preparation for becoming a clinical, counseling, or school psychologist when prior training had not been in the relevant area.

  • Upon fulfillment of all formal requirements of such training program, the student should be awarded a certificate indicating the successful completion of preparation in the particular specialty, thus according them due recognition for their additional education and experience.

  • This policy statement shall be incorporated in the guidelines of the Committee on Accreditation so that appropriate sanctions can be brought to bear on university and internship training programs which violate paragraph 4, and/or 5 of the above.**

**The following was approved by the Council of Representatives of APA at its January 22-24, 1982 meeting.

"The American Psychological Association holds that respecialization education and training for psychologists possessing the doctoral degree should be conducted by those academic units in regionally accredited universities and professional schools currently offering doctoral training in the relevant specialty, and in conjunction with regularly organized internship agencies where appropriate. Respecialization for purposes of offering services in clinical, counseling, or school psychology should be linked to relevant APA approved programs.

 
1/02 APPENDIX THREE


AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
CONTINUING EDUCATION SPONSOR APPROVAL SYSTEM

FEE SCHEDULE



Type of Fee A PA Division, State or
Regional Association
Others

Application Fee $180 $300
  -Due with application

   
Recognition Fee $360 $600
  -Due with invoice after
initial approval, one time,
only for as long as approval
is maintained.

   
Annual Fee $240 $400
  -Due with invoice at the
beginning of each approval
year, including the first
year.

   
Innactive Status Annual Fee $120 $200
  -Inactive status must
be requested in writing.
   


 
1/02 APPENDIX FOUR


CE SPONSOR APPROVAL SYSTEM


Procedures for Reconsideration and Appeal
of Adverse Decisions


The Committee for the Approval of Continuing Education Sponsors shall review completed applications at its regularly scheduled meetings and shall evaluate the applications in reference to the APA Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists: Criteria and Procedures Manual, November 1996. The Committee's decisions must be by majority vote.

The decision by the Committee for the Approval of CE Sponsors to deny, withdraw approval, or to place or to continue a sponsor on probation, hereinafter referred to as an "adverse decision," shall be transmitted to the sponsor or sponsor applicant in a notification letter.

Reconsideration or review on appeal may be sought only from an adverse decision as defined herein. The letter of notification shall include the basis for the decision and inform the sponsor or sponsor applicant of the right to request reconsideration by the Committee or a hearing before an ad hoc Appeals Panel appointed by the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association. A written request for reconsideration or appeal timely filed shall automatically stay the adverse decision until the reconsideration or hearing by the Appeals Panel is completed. The approval status of the institution during the process of reconsideration or appeal shall remain as it was prior to the adverse decision.

I.  RECONSIDERATION
  1. If reconsideration is desired, a written request for reconsideration shall be submitted to the Chair of the Committee for the Approval of CE Sponsors within thirty (30) days following the date of receipt of the notification letter to the institution and shall specify reasons for requesting reconsideration.


  2. Reconsideration shall be based only on information submitted by the sponsor or sponsor applicant in response to issues raised by the initial decision, and the information before the Committee at the time of its initial decision. If, however, the sponsor or sponsor applicant seeks to submit new information relevant to the approval decision (e.g., changes in the program since the initial decision), a new application must be filed, and a petition for reconsideration will not be entertained.


  3. The reconsideration will occur at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee or, in cases of denial or termination of currently approved sponsors by conference call of the Committee, and shall be at no additional cost to the sponsor or sponsor applicant.


  4. If the reconsideration is conducted by conference call, all materials in support of the reconsideration must be submitted within thirty (30) days following the date of receipt of the notification letter. The conference call will be conducted as soon as possible after receipt of supporting materials.


  5. If, following the reconsideration, the Sponsor Approval Committee sustains its initial action or renders a further adverse decision, the sponsor applicant may request a hearing before an Appeals Panel.
II.  APPEALS HEARING
  1. A sponsor or sponsor applicant who has received an adverse decision may request a hearing before an Appeals Panel. A written request for appeal should be received by the President of the American Psychological Association within thirty (30) days of the date of receipt of the notification of either (a) the Committee's initial adverse decision, or (b) the Committee's adverse decision upon reconsideration. If no timely request is received, then the decision of the Committee is final. The request for a hearing shall include a statement of reasons for appealing the decision of the Committee. Any issue not stated in the request for hearing will not be considered on appeal. Appeals may be based only on the grounds that the Sponsor Approval Committee's decision was (l) arbitrary, capricious or otherwise not in accordance with the criteria and procedures of the Committee or (2) not supported by substantial evidence.


  2. Composition of Appeals Panel
    The Appeals Panel shall be composed of three (3) members, to be selected according to the following procedures:

  3. From a list of individuals qualified to serve as members of an appeals panel, a Board of Directors Subcommittee (President, Past-President, and Secretary) will appoint three (3) individuals, of whom two must be APA members, to serve on the Appeals Panel for a particular appeal.

    The names of the three (3) appointees who agree to serve on the Appeals Panel shall be communicated to the appellant. If the appellant shows good cause why a named principal is unacceptable, an alternative will be selected who is acceptable to both parties. No member of the panel hearing a particular appeal shall have had any prior connection with either the appellant or with the approval process for that particular appellant.
  4. Hearings, requested in conformity with these procedures, will take place within ninety (90) days or at a time mutually satisfactory to APA and the appellant. The appellant shall be notified of the time and place of the hearing.


  5. Any additional information supplied by the appellant must be for the purposes of clarification only and cannot describe new components of the institution or changes made subsequent to the initial review/action. Any such new information will not be considered by the Appeals Panel.


  6. Written briefs may be submitted to the Appeals Panel up to two weeks prior to the hearing. Briefs must contain appropriate citations to the record, as defined in Paragraph II (H), infra, and to Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists: Criteria and Procedures Manual (November, 1996).


  7. In addition to the three Appeals Panel members and the Panel's counsel, those present at the hearing will include: the representative and counsel of the appellant (if desired), a representative of the Committee, and the APA staff.


  8. At the hearing, the appellant's representative, including counsel, shall first present arguments regarding issues raised on appeal. The Committee's representative shall be allowed to ask questions and make the Committee's presentation. After questions of the Committee's representative by the appellant, both sides shall be allowed closing statements. The Appeals Panel shall be free to interrupt with questions of its own during any part of the hearing. The Appeals Panel may depart from this format should considerations of fairness so require.


  9. The basis for the findings of the Appeals Panel shall be: (a) the record on review, which shall consist of materials before the Committee (initially and on reconsideration); records of a site visit, if one was made; material obtained by the Committee from local professional associations or specialty experts, and responsive documents filed by the sponsor during the course of the approval process; and (b) briefs of both parties.


  10. The Appeals Panel shall have the power by majority vote to grant full or conditional approval, to place or to continue a sponsor on probation, to deny approval, to order a site visit, or to order further proceedings before the Committee. The decision of the Appeals Panel shall be final.


  11. The report of the Panel, including the decision and the reasons for it, will be prepared within 30 days and will be addressed to the President of APA. Copies will be forwarded to the sponsor contact person and the Executive Officer of the Association.


  12. The appellant shall pay the expenses incurred in sending its representative (and counsel) to the hearing. In addition, the appellant shall pay one half of the expenses incurred by APA in the conduct of the hearing. Those expenses shall consist of travel, hotel accommodations, and meals for the three Appeals Panel members, counsel for the Appeals Panel, and the representative from the Committee.
At the time a request for an appeal is made, the expenses to be incurred by APA will be estimated and the sponsor or sponsor applicant shall forward a check for the estimated payment of its share of the expenses as a deposit to be used against such expenses. Any balance due shall be paid by the appellant within thirty (30) days of the date of the appeals hearing. Any surplus of the deposit shall be returned to the appellant by APA within thirty (30) days of the appeals hearing. APA shall furnish the appellant with an itemized statement of all expenses.

III.  CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS

The work of the Committee in approving sponsors of continuing education for psychologists, including, but not limited to, all deliberations, decisions, proceedings, records, and other materials utilized in the approval process shall be kept confidential except:
  1. disclosure shall be made in those instances in which the Association is legally advised or required to disclose such information;


  2. information on a specific sponsor may be made available to other accrediting agencies by which the sponsor has been approved or whose approval it is seeking;


  3. approved minutes of the Committee's decisions regarding sponsors shall be available to the Board of Educational Affairs, the Executive Director of the Education Directorate, the Continuing Education Program Office staff, the Deputy Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Executive Officer;


  4. in the case of an appeal, the Committee's decision as recorded in the minutes shall be available to the Board of Directors.


  5. the APA's legal counsel may be requested to review application materials.


© 2008 American Psychological Association
Continuing Education in Psychology • Sponsor Approval System
750 First Street, NE • Washington, DC • 20002-4242
Phone: 800-374-2721 ext. 5991 • TDD/TTY: 202-336-6123
Fax: (202) 336-6151 • E-mail
PsychNET® | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Security | Advertise with us