Presidents Column
James Zacny
[adapted from the Spring 2005 issue of the
Newsletter]
I would like to thank my colleagues across the country for voting
for me, and am aware of the responsibilities placed on me for this coming year:
to represent, to serve, and to be responsive to the membership, and to hopefully
make contributions to the division, as all of my predecessors have.
I would also like
to thank Jim Sorensen for his service to the division as President in 2004. I
learned a great deal from him, and am glad that the system is now set up so
that he is still someone I can fall back on when advice is needed. As well,
I can seek advice from our president-elect, Alan Budney.
A number of people have rotated off the Executive Committee and each of them
deserves a really big thank you for their service to the division: Frank
Holloway (past-president), Cora Lee Wetherington (member-at-large), Hendree
Jones (Secretary), Nancy Petry (Newsletter Editor), and Herb Barry (Archivist).
John Roll was our membership chair, but I am happy to say he has agreed to
become our Newsletter Editor. As you can see from the back page of the
newsletter we have some very competent people who have joined the Executive
Committee, and we have some colleagues who have graciously agreed to serve
extra terms Ron Wood, Jane Acri, and Anthony Liguori.
One of the initiatives I wanted to take up during my term as president
was working with John on revamping the newsletter. Nancy Petry, and
before her Craig Rush, and before him me, actively solicited for articles,
letters to the editor, etc. But such materials did not come to us in any
abundance. To that end, John will be assembling a small committee whose
mission it will be to examine newsletters from other APA divisions and
from organizations outside of APA to determine some of the features they
run on a regular basis, and then to discuss what features might be added
to our newsletter, and give those features a trial run.
John and his
committee will also be exploring the possibility of switching over to
an e-version of the newsletter. The newsletter would be assembled as a
PDF file and one could simply print out the copy. I am only presenting
this as something that will be discussed the input of the membership
will be solicited. I would anticipate that for those members who want
the newsletter mailed to them by the U.S. Post Office that they will be accommodated.
Diana Walker is our Division Program Chair and based on the quality of
the submissions that she has received, the program for this years convention
in Washington, D.C. ought to be excellent.
Related to the convention, I would like to close this column with what I
hope is an interesting story. I am not sure what the theme is I think
there are several: 1) if you have an idea about the division and how to
better it, pass it on to me or to anybody else on the Executive Committee,
because that idea could very well come to fruition; 2) it is amazing how
some things just pick up momentum and fall into place; and 3) sometimes
long-past wrongs can be rectified.
Vic Laties was musing one day with Ron Wood about how some of the highest
impact work in behavioral pharmacology was never published, and thought
that it should be recognized in some way. So Vic was invited to participate
in one of the monthly Executive Committee teleconferences in the early spring
of 2004 during which he suggested that the division consider giving an award
to two scientists who in the early 1980s did pioneering research on nicotine
psychopharmacology.
The two scientists, Drs. Vic DeNoble and Paul Mele, at the time worked for
Philip Morris, and in one of their studies they established that nicotine
served as a reinforcer in rats. A manuscript reporting these findings was
sent to Herb Barry who was then field editor for Psychopharmacology, and
on two separate occasions (1983 and 1986) the authors withdrew the manuscript
for further consideration because of injunctions and threats of lawsuits by
Philip Morris.
In 1984 the two scientists were fired from Philip Morris, and
the non-publication of the paper, according to Jack Henningfield, set the
field back for at least six years before work like it could be accomplished
by Canadian researchers (Drs. Corrigall and Coen).
The Executive Committee
liked Vics idea of recognizing the work of Drs. DeNoble and Mele, and through
further discussion thought that perhaps a symposium centering on the paper as
well as current nicotine research and policy might be more suitable than an award.
I was assigned as the point person to further explore this. The first thing I did
was to call Klaus Mizcek who is a current editor of Psychopharmacology to ask him
whether there was any possibility that the paper could be published in the journal
that had originally accepted it for publication close to 20 years ago. Klaus not
only said the paper could be published but that he would be willing to devote a
special issue of Psychopharmacology to nicotine-related research.
Next I hunted
down Drs. DeNoble and Mele, who no longer work in the field, and they were willing
to have their paper published and they were willing to participate in the symposium
(Vic DeNoble said he still had the manuscript and if he rooted around in his basement
could probably find the figure glossies!).
Note that the only other place this manuscript can be read is in the online
archives of the Waxman committee hearings in 1994, where this sequence of
events had a huge impact: it was dramatic proof that the tobacco companies
had covered up evidence documenting abuse potential that was generated in
their own laboratories. The rest is history.
Things just kept on falling into place. Jack Henningfield and Ian Stolerman,
two world-renowned experts on tobacco, agreed to co-chair the symposium.
Speakers will be Drs. DeNoble and Mele describing their research and their
travails with the tobacco company, and Drs. Athina Markou, Jed Rose, Maxine
Stitzer, and Jack Henningfield. The discussant will be Mitch Zeller, a lawyer
who served as Associate Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration
during the Clinton Administration. Zeller led FDAs investigation of the
tobacco industry, and helped reveal the role of self-administration research
as well as the saga of DeNoble and Meles ill-fated efforts to publish their
work in Psychopharmacology.
All of this initiated by a comment from Vic: the serendipity I encountered throughout
all of this; the enthusiasm of everybody I talked to (I dont think I heard the word no
once); and justice will finally be served when the paper gets published, after a delayH5
of 20 years. Oh, and I forgot to mention, Dr. DeNoble tried to present the paper in 1983
at the annual APA convention but could not because Philip Morris had placed an injunction
on the poster. So he stood in front of an empty poster board on Friday, August 26, 1983.
Now the story of Dr. DeNoble and Mele can be heard at this years APA convention. In
closing, I hope to serve the Division well during my term as President. And I am always
open to hearing your ideas and concerns:
jzacny@dacc.uchicago.edu.
Jim
Revised October 12, 2005 (rww & vgl)
|