The Editors encourage submission of any announcements, and/or letters to the editors, regarding psychological science.
Comments on the content and presentation of the newsletter are also appreciated.
Kristi S. Multhaup
Mark E. Faust
Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte
Why waste your time subjecting your family and friends to your humor when you can elicit guffaws from your colleagues? Send us your science related humor: email@example.com
Subscribe to the Division 3 E-mail network to keep informed about Division 3 and issues regarding psychological science. This is a monitored network to keep the number of e-mails down.
Subscribe: Send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Leave the Subject line blank and type “subscribe div3” in the body of the message.
Send a Message (once subscribed): email@example.com
Questions: Send e-mail to Neal Johnson, Ohio State University, firstname.lastname@example.org
Thomas R. Zentall
University of Kentucky
Johns Hopkins University
University of Colorado
Wilfrid Laurier University
Charles L. Brewer
Members-At-Large of the
Mark A. McDaniel (8/05-08)
Washington University, St. Louis
Valerie F. Renya (8/05-08)
Nelson Cowan (8/04-07)
University of Missouri
Ralph R. Miller (8/04-07)
Binghamton Univ., SUNY
Mark H. Ashcraft (8/05-06)
Veronica J. Dark (8/03-06)
Iowa State University
Representative to APA Council
Lewis P. Lipsitt (8/04-07)
Emanuel E. Donchin (8/03-06)
University of South Florida
Board of Directors
J. Bruce Overmier
University of Minnesota
William D. Timberlake (Awards)
Mark H. Ashcraft (Fellows)
Randall W. Engle (Membership)
Georgia Institute of Technology
Marvin Lamb (Program)
Cal. State Hayward
On February 3rd, NIH announced its long anticipated policy
designed to provide public access to the scientific data its grantees and
intramural scientists produce. In a "stakeholders' teleconference, NIH
Director Elias Zerhouni and his staff read the policy and responded to
questions. The policy as announced calls for scientists whose work is funded
by NIH in part or in full to submit their manuscripts to NIH's PubMed
Central for public release "as soon as possible" within 12 months after
final publication. Zerhouni and his Deputy Director Norka Ruiz Bravo framed
this policy as promoting the agency's goals of increased visibility for NIH
research and as addressing the public's demands for open access and a public
archive. However, they also made it clear that complying with the policy
directives is voluntary and discretionary, and that the timing of
submissions is up to the author. They urged that publishers work closely
with authors in implementing the policy, but did not involve them directly.
The initial reactions to this policy initiative have been varied. In the question and answer period following the announcement, as well as in news articles, interviews, and opinion pieces following the announcement, representatives from professional science associations, patient advocate groups, scientists, publishers and the public have discussed the policy. Responses range from congratulations on beginning to address the access issue to disappointment that access is neither compulsory or rapid; with questions about copyright, enforceability, implementation and feasibility.
The present policy is a much weaker version than that promulgated in draft versions. According to NIH, this policy, revised after receiving more than 6,200 comments on the draft versions (read APA's comments at: http://www.apa.org/science/psa/nihopenaccess.pdf), attempts to provide flexibility and to promote maximum participation. The goal, according to NIH, is to build an archive of all NIH funded work in a single compendium that will be easily accessed and searched. Further information is available at http://www.nih.gov/about/publicaccess/index.htm.