Using the New Bloom's Taxonomy to Design Meaningful Learning Assessments
Kevin Smythe & Jane Halonen
YAAWYNNN. Oh no, that dreaded signal that students give to let you know they
aren't engaged in the learning that you have planned. To reduce disengagement,
teachers move beyond lecture in search of new ways to engage students in the
learning process. Engaging students requires mechanisms that increase class
participation and facilitate higher-order learning. The purpose of this segment
is to provide teachers with some tools for promoting higher-order learning.
Developing higher-order thinking skills in students is not an easy task. Historically,
teachers have looked to Bloom's Taxonomy (1956) for assistance. Bloom's model
divided thinking skills into lower-order and higher-order knowledge. The early
taxonomy began with knowledge, understanding, and application as lower level
skills and cast higher level skills as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
Bloom's Taxonomy Revisited
Although Bloom's Taxonomy proved useful to teachers
and students alike, recent decades gave rise to numerous criticisms, implying
that the model was out of date. These criticisms included concerns with setting
applicability, contemporary language, and process conceptualization. More
recently, Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) have adapted Bloom's model to fit
the needs of today's classroom by employing more outcome-oriented language,
workable objectives, and changing nouns to active verbs (see "stairs"
below). Most notably, knowledge has been converted to remember.
In addition, the highest level of development is create rather than
evaluate.
Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy
Please move the cursor over the steps below to reveal the meaning of each.
Source: Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.) (2001).
A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment:
A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
How the Taxonomy Promotes Active Learning
Clark (2002) provided an adaptation of Bloom's work to facilitate active learning.
Although originally the tool was developed by a class of teachers for use
in curriculum building in the high school level, the suggestions would work
for college level classes as well. The inner ring contains the original levels
of Bloom's taxonomy. The middle ring offers synonyms for the various academic
processes that comprise that taxonomic level. The outer ring links process
to product. For example, if you wanted to increase application skills, you
might ask students to construct diagrams of the key concepts involved in the
content of the class. If you wish to improve evaluation skills, you might
ask students to produce an editorial for the student newspaper in which they
discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a particular side of a controversial
issue. We have modernized the language of the original circle to reflect the
latest version of Bloom's Taxonomy.
Cognitive Taxonomy Circle

Based on: Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted:
Developing the potential of children at home and at school.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Return to Assessment CyberGuide home page