Workshop Evaluation Tool #1

CE Program Title
Sponsoring organization
Date

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
1. The program objectives were met.
A. Objective #1 (Write out specific objective)12345
B. Objective #2 (Write out specific objective)12345
C. Objective #3 etc. (Write out specific objective)12345
2. Accuracy and utility of content were discussed.12345
3. Content was appropriate for postdoctoral level training12345
4. Instruction at a level appropriate to postdoctoral level training.12345
5. Teaching methods were effective.12345
6. Visual aids, handouts, and oral presentations clarified content12345

 

 Instructor 1:

Name: _____________________________

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
7.  Knew the subject matter12345
8.  Taught the subject completely12345
9.  Elaborated upon the stated objectives12345
10. Presented content in an organized manner12345
11. Maintained my interest12345
12. Answered questions effectively12345
13. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions12345

 

Instructor 2:

Name: ____________________________

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
8.  Knew the subject matter12345
9.  Taught the subject completely12345
10.  Elaborated upon the stated objectives12345
11. Presented content in an organized manner12345
12. Maintained my interest12345
13. Answered questions effectively12345
14. Was responsive to questions, comments, and opinions12345

 

Professional & Ethical Issues
15. Presenter (or program chair, etc.) made clearly evident, prior to registration, the following: 
a. Requirements for successful completion of activityYesNo
b. Commercial support for CE program, sponsor, or instructor (or any other relationship that could reasonably be construed as a conflict of interest)YesNo
c. Commercial support for content of instruction (e.g., research grants funding research findings etc.) that could be construed as a conflict of interestYesNo
d. Commercial support or benefit for endorsement of products (e.g., books, training, drugs, etc.)YesNo
e. Accuracy and utility of the materials presented, the basis of such statements, the limitations of the content being taught and the severe and most common risks?YesNo

 

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
16. Facility was adequate for my needs12345
17. Special needs were met12345
18. Facility was comfortable and accessible12345
19. Food and beverage were adequate (if applicable)12345
20. Program brochure was informative and accurate12345

 

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree
21. Information could be applied to my practice (if applicable) 12345
22. Information could contribute to achieving personal or professional goals.12345
23. Cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and gender differences were considered.12345
24. How much did you learn in this course?Very LittleLittleSomeA Good BitA Great Deal
25. Did this program enhance your professional expertise?YesNo
26. Would you recommend this program to others?YesNo

 

Participant Information
27. Please note your profession and status (Check all that apply)□ Psychologist □ Medical Professional □ Masters Level Licensed Therapist□ Social Worker □ Student
¬ Administrator □ University Faculty □ Other:□ list profession
28. Please note years in your profession□  Student □  1-5 □  6-10 □  11-20  □  20+

 

Narrative

29. What was your overall impression of the activity?  What went well? What could have been improved?

 

 

30. What did you learn that was new or different?  How and/or will this information change how you practice?

 

 

31. What did you learn that was new or different?  How and/or will this information change how you practice?

 

 

32. What topics or presenters would you like to see at future CE presentations?

 

 

5. Other comments

 

 

Please use another sheet of paper if you wish to expand on your observations.

Note: Item numbering is included to facilitate CEC discussion and will require revision.