|
“Lobbying
is quite unseemly and inappropriate for a psychologist. I believe there
should be a distinct line between academia and politics.”
|
In
fact, the funding that we receive (or, our students will receive to
support themselves) for education/training (clinical, academic, research)
is intertwined with the Congressional decision making process. We cannot
afford to ignore it; we must participate – as do all the other
disciplines – or be left out.
|
|
“It
won't make any difference if I participate (i.e., they’re all crooks
anyway, and the political process is corrupt and immoral).”
|
Despite sensational
media reports, most politicians are honest and hard working.
Plus, your participation will actually help increase the
accountability of your Member to the community. Further, as we all know,
if you want to see something change, you must get involved.
Tell me about what
concerns you have locally and what you hope might be done in D.C.
Perhaps there may be a way to address these concerns through our
lobbying efforts.
|
|
“Sorry,
I think grassroots/lobbying is useless.”
“Sorry,
but I’m philosophically opposed to getting involved in lobbying (i.e.,
not relevant, want to avoid corrupting influence, stay clear of anything
political).”
|
For an individual
psychologist, it may seem useless, but FEDAC is a network. Your voice,
together with many others across the nation, can make a difference!
Example: Many
psychologists thought it was useless to lobby for Older Americans Act, but
with the help of just a handful of psychologists, APA successfully
influenced the bill's passage and gained federal support for
mental/behavioral health services, including training.
You know, you might
feel it is useless – but only until you have participated in grassroots
advocacy. In no time, you
will realize how easy it actually is.
|
|
“I’m
too busy to get involved. I
don’t have the time.”
“Philosophically,
I differ with APA's interests so why would I spend my
already-over-committed time talking to a legislator who won't listen
anyway.”
“My
legislator won’t listen; I can't impact legislation.”
|
Yes, it does
require some time, but not as much as you probably expect.
Most importantly, the time and energy that you do devote to FEDAC
can have a tremendous impact on your program and your students.
Actually, you might be
surprised to learn what APA is doing…for example APA is working on
student funding through GPE.
In fact,
legislators do listen, especially to university faculty; they want to know
how legislation will impact their constituents (District).
They expect to hear from you; they need your input AND your
expertise.
|
|
“My
Congressperson is a [Republican or Democrat] and I'm not going to vote for
him nor get involved in fundraisers. My Congressperson doesn't support
this issue and/or psychology.”
|
Gaining
federal support of psychology is not a partisan issue; APA seeks support
no matter which party is in the leadership.
Getting involved is not a request for your vote or give money –
only to advocate for psychology.
Even if your Congressman isn’t
supporting this issue, he/she nevertheless has a very influential role (or
serves) on an important committee and it is critical that he/she hears
from you – the constituent (the voter).
|