|
Testimony Submitted by
THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
to the U.S. Senate
Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
for the Hearing on
EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA)
February 27, 2002
The American Psychological Association (APA) is the largest scientific and
professional organization representing psychology in the United States. Its
membership includes more than 155,000 researchers, educators, clinicians,
consultants, and students. Our mission is to advance psychology as a science, as
a profession, and as a means of promoting human welfare. We are writing to
express our support for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. It
is the empirically-based position of our association that discrimination based
upon sexual orientation is "detrimental to mental health and the public
good" (APA Council resolution adopted February 1993).
Prevalence of Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
Research has found that over one-third of GLB African Americans and more than
one-half of GLB whites have experienced discrimination based upon sexual
orientation (Krieger & Signey, 1997). Furthermore, depending upon an
individual's race/ethnicity, discrimination based upon sexual orientation may be
coupled with various other forms of discrimination. Researchers examined biases
against women, African Americans, and homosexuals in hiring practices and found
that African American gay men were the most likely group to be discriminated
against (Crow, Fok, & Hartman, 1998).
Data on hate crimes further demonstrates how victimization based upon sexual
orientation can have negative consequences for individuals. Discrimination and
hatred directed at gay, lesbian, and bisexual (GLB) individuals is manifested
through higher rates of victimization than that experienced by the general
population. For instance, according to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, of the
1,487 sexual hate crimes reported in 1999, nearly 69% (1,025) were directed
toward male homosexuals.
A recent study found high percentages of GLB individuals reported as being
the victim of a hate crime (Herek, Gillis, & Cogan, 1999). Of the nearly
2,000 GLB individuals surveyed, roughly one-fifth of the women and one-fourth of
the men reported being the victim of a hate crime since age 16. One woman in
eight and one man in six had been victimized within the last five years. More
than half the respondents reported anti-gay verbal threats and harassment in the
year before the survey.
Researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) found that
of the 2,900 individuals surveyed, GLB persons were more likely to attribute
their discrimination to sexual orientation than were heterosexual individuals
(Mays & Cochran, 2001). Over 25% of GLB respondents (compared to 2% of
heterosexual respondents) indicated sexual orientation as the basis for their
being discriminated against. Additionally, GLB individuals were more likely than
heterosexual individuals to report that discrimination made life harder and had
interfered with their leading a full and productive life.
Mental Health Effects of Discrimination
The effects of discrimination and victimization based upon sexual orientation
can have far-reaching consequences. GLB individuals may experience more
psychological distress than the general population, not as a result of innate
biological etiology of sexual orientation, but as a result of a social context
that stigmatizes homosexuality (Waldo, 1995). According to researchers,
psychological distress among GLB individuals may arise from a constant state of
being in a minority status that is emphasized and condemned (Meyers, 1995).
Research has indicated that social stigma based upon sexual orientation may be a
risk factor for psychological distress, depression, and anxiety (Cochran, 2001).
In a study of 741 adult gay men, there were significant relationships between
those individuals who experienced prejudicial events (e.g., insults and
discrimination) and negative mental health outcomes. Similarly, other studies
have linked risk of depression and suicide among gay and lesbian adolescents and
adults to anti-gay discrimination (Bradford, Ryan, & Rothblum, 1994; Cochran
& Mays, 1994; Meyer, 1995).
GLB individuals report higher rates of perceived discrimination than do
heterosexuals (Mays & Cochran, 2001). Such perceived discrimination may
interfere with an individual's psychological well-being. Researchers at UCLA
examined the prevalence of discriminatory experiences and their relationship
with indicators of psychiatric morbidity among GLB and heterosexual individuals.
Using data from a large, nationally representative survey, the researchers asked
individuals who identified themselves as either GLB (73) or heterosexual (2844)
about their lifetime and day-to-day experiences with discrimination (such as
their interpersonal and work experiences). The researchers also assessed
one-year prevalence of depressive, anxiety, substance dependence disorders,
current psychological distress, and self-rated mental health. Perceived
discrimination was not only associated with stressful life circumstances, but it
was also related to mental health status. Individuals who reported higher levels
of discrimination were also more likely to report "poor" or
"fair" mental health, psychological distress, and mental disorders.
Researchers have also examined the deleterious mental health effects of
criminal victimization based upon sexual orientation. GLB persons suffer more
serious psychological effects from victimization based upon sexual orientation
than they do from other kinds of criminal injury (Otis & Skinner, 1996). In
their case, the association between vulnerability and sexual orientation is
particularly harmful because sexual identity is such an important part of one's
self-concept. Gay men and lesbians who have been victimized due to their sexual
orientation report feeling less safe in the world, view people as more
malevolent, reveal a diminished sense of self-mastery and appear to attribute
personal set-backs to sexual prejudice (Herek, Gillis, & Cochran, 1999).
Hence, for gay men and lesbians, crimes based upon sexual orientation negatively
impact their view of the world in addition to causing other harmful mental
health outcomes (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder).
Discrimination in the Workplace
Discrimination against GLB individuals in the workplace is prevalent and has
deleterious consequences. For instance, in a study of student affairs employees,
over one-fourth of the 249 individuals surveyed reported having been
discriminated against based upon sexual orientation during the job search
process. Additionally, those individuals who disclosed their sexual orientation
were more likely to report discrimination (Croteau & Destinon, 1994). Within
medical settings, about one-third of the GLB physicians and medical students
surveyed reported that, because of their sexual orientation, they had been
denied employment, refused medical privileges, denied a promotion, loan, or
referrals from other physicians, or were fired from their positions (Schatz
& O'Hanlan, 1994).
Anti-discrimination policies in the workplace can also affect job
satisfaction and productivity. GLB individuals are more likely to report
discrimination in organizations that do not have policies against GLB
discrimination. Furthermore, such policies not only affect prevalence of
discrimination but also impact worker performance. GLB individuals who report
higher levels of perceived discrimination based upon sexual orientation are more
likely to have negative work attitudes and fewer work promotions (Ragins &
Cornwell, 2001). Research has found that an atmosphere of tolerance, as
demonstrated by anti-discrimination policies, may lead to higher levels of job
satisfaction and job commitment among GLB individuals (Burton, 2001). A survey
of 744 GLB individuals indicated positive employee outcomes for supportive
anti-discrimination policies (Day & Schoenrade, 2000). The researchers found
a significant relationship between self-disclosure, anti-discrimination
policies, and top management support for equal rights and organizational
commitment. Additionally, anti-discrimination policies and top management
support were also related to job satisfaction.
Conclusions
In sum, psychological research findings indicate that GLB individuals report
significantly higher levels of discrimination based upon sexual orientation than
do heterosexual individuals. These findings are especially troubling given that
discrimination and stigmatization may lead to greater vulnerability of negative
mental health outcomes. Research documents that workplace discrimination based
upon sexual orientation is common and negatively affects employees, as well as
employers. However, studies have found that supportive anti-discrimination
policies, as well as top management support, can help increase job satisfaction,
as well as increase organizational commitment among GLB individuals. Thus, it is
critical for employers to create a work environment that does not tolerate
discrimination based upon sexual orientation.
REFERENCES
Bradford, J., Ryan, C., & Rothblum, E.D. (1994). National lesbian health
care survey: Implications for mental health care. Journal of Consulting Clinical
Psychology, 62, 228-242.
Burton, S. B. (2001). Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: A
cross-level
examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 17-28.
Cochran, S. D. (2001). Emerging issues in research on lesbians' and gay men's
mental health:
Does sexual orientation really matter? American Psychologist, 56(11),
929-947.
Cochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1994). Depressive distress among
homosexually active African
American men and women. American Journal of Psychology, 151, 524-529.
Croteau, J. M., & von Destinon, M. (1994). A national survey of job
search experiences of lesbian,
gay, and bisexual student affairs professionals. Journal of
College Student Development, 35, 40-45.
Crow, S. M., Fok, L., Y., & Hartman, S. J. (1998). Who is at greater risk
of work-related discrimination: Women, Blacks, or homosexuals? Employee
Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 11(1), 15-26.
Day, N. E., & Schoenrade, P. (2000). The relationship among reported
disclosure of sexual orientation, anti-discrimination policies, top management support and
work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees. Personnel Review, 29(3),
346-363.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, (2001). Hate Crime Statistics, 1999.
Herek, G., M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C. (1999). Psychological
sequelae of hate-crime
victimization among lesbian, gay and bisexual adults. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(6), 945-951.
Krieger, N., & Sidney, S. (1997). Prevalence and health implications of
anti-gay discrimination: A study of Black and White women and men in the CARDIA cohort. Journal
of Health Services. 27(1), 156-176.
Mays, V. M., & Cochran, S. S. (2001). Mental health correlates of
perceived discrimination among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. American
Journal of Public Health, 91(11),1869-76.
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal
of Health Social Behavior, 36, 38-56.
Otis, M. D. & Skinner, W. F. (1996). The prevalence of victimization and
its effects on mental well-being among lesbian and gay people. Journal of Homosexuality, 30(30),
93-117.
Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink triangles: Antecedents and
consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 86(6),1244-1261.
Schatz, B., & O'Hanlan, K. (1994). Anti-gay discrimination in medicine:
Results of a national survey of lesbian, gay, and bisexual physicians. American Association
of Physicians for Human Rights. San Francisco.
Waldo, C. (1999). Working in a majority context: A structural model of
heterosexism as minority stress in the workplace. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 46 (2), 218-232.
Back to Top^
|