|
February 12, 2002
Mr. John Magaw,
Under Secretary of Transportation for Security
Transportation Security Administration, Room 10228
Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Under Secretary Magaw,
I am writing with reference to provisions of the recently enacted Aviation
and Transportation Security Act (Public Law No. 107-71) that describe security
research and development (R&D) programs within the newly authorized
Transportation Security Administration (TSA).
Scientific Advisory Panel - Placement
The Aviation and Transportation Security Act amends the US Code to transfer
aviation security R&D from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to the
TSA and calls for establishment of a Scientific Advisory Panel to provide
oversight for security R&D programs. The Scientific Advisory Panel, as
described, would function as a subcommittee of the existing FAA Research,
Engineering and Development Advisory Committee (REDAC).
We recognize that this may present an awkward arrangement because the
security mandate for the TSA includes security for all modes of transportation.
However to the extent that the Scientific Advisory Panel provides oversight for
aviation security R&D we strongly recommend that TSA develop a mechanism to
integrate that review with programs under REDAC's jurisdiction. We believe that
in order to provide a comprehensive security system architecture for aviation,
issues related to aviation security R&D must be considered in the context of
issues before other existing REDAC subcommittees (e.g., airports, air traffic
services, aircraft safety). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) has already set precedent for this arrangement with FAA in the joint
management and oversight of aviation safety programs and such an arrangement
could serve as a useful model for security program oversight as well.
Scientific Advisory Panel - Composition
The "General Requirements" section of the US Code (Sec. 40119) amended
to transfer authority for research and development to the TSA reads as follows:
(a) General Requirements - -The Under Secretary for Transportation Security
shall conduct research (including behavioral research) and development
activities appropriate to develop, modify, test, and evaluate a system,
procedure, facility, or device to protect passengers and property against acts
of criminal violence and aircraft piracy
We believe that the massive expansion of the federal security workforce as
well as the introduction of new technologies and innovative procedures will
require a commensurate increase in attention to human behavior and human factors
in security R&D. Well before 9/11, FAA had demonstrated its appreciation of
behavioral science by forming the Human Factors Subcommittee of the REDAC.
Further, the immediate past-chair of that Subcommittee, Dr. Deborah Boehm-Davis,
Professor of Psychology at George Mason University, now Chairs the REDAC.
Because we recognize that the TSA is evolving quickly and is pressed to meet
a variety of legislative deadlines, we are submitting a slate of nominees for
the TSA Scientific Advisory Panel. Please find attached biographical material
for the following behavioral scientists representing a range of expertise across
air, surface and marine transportation in academic, industrial and government
settings:
Like you, we are very interested in making sure that sound science is used to
inform policy as the Transportation Security Administration takes on the
critical mission of ensuring the nation's transportation system. The American
Psychological Association stands ready as your conduit to our nation's expertise
in such areas as human error, efficiency, safety, automation, signal detection
and vigilance, perception, cognition, and decision making, performance under
stress, personnel selection, training, and organizational behavior.
APA represents 155,000 members and affiliates and is the largest organization
of psychologists in the world. Our mission is to advance psychology as a
science, as a profession, and as a means of promoting human welfare.
Read
the letter to
Under Secretary James Loy (3/03)
Back to Top^
|