Contact Site Map Home APA Online Public Policy Home Public Policy Home
PPO Masthead
Science Policy Public Interest Policy Education Policy News Take Action Fellowships About PPO

APA Activities Supporting the National Institutes of Health Peer Review

APA science policy staff continue to monitor increasing congressional inquiries regarding research funding decisions made by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Given the recent doubling of the NIH budget, it is understandable that Congress would exercise its oversight authority to ensure that scarce federal research dollars are being spent on high quality research that is relevant to the public health. However, congressional attempts to restrict funding for peer-reviewed research grants that have been through the NIH’s rigorous peer-review process have alerted the scientific community that policymakers need more information about the public health significance of behavioral research as well as information on the peer review process.

Psychologists are encouraged to show their support of NIH and scientific integrity by signing on to a petition developed by the Coalition to Protect Research, which is co-chaired by APA.

You can still take action on this issue. Sign the Coalition to Protect Research Petition Now.

Action Alert!  Protect Psychological Research at NIH (6/22/05) 
More information:
Coalition to Protect Research Briefing Sheet [PDF]*
Letter from APA CEO Norman Anderson to House of Representatives [PDF]*
Statement of Rep. Leach in Support of Peer Review
Rep. Neugebauer's attack on NIMH [PDF]*

Coalition to Protect Research

Controversy over Scientific Integrity in Policy Making

green triangleLinks to relevant reports, statements, and other information regarding accusations of misuse of science by the Bush Administration

Archived background information:

green triangleRead Neugebauer's amendments (9/9/04) 

Letter from House Appropriations Committee Chairman Bill Young (R-FL) and House Labor/HHS Subcommittee Chairman Ralph Regula (R-OH) to all House members regarding the possibility of another amendment (8/13/04) [PDF]*

green triangleRead the APA bulletin - "Sexual Health Grants Targeted By Conservative Group"

green triangleRead the APA Statement on Peer Review Process (11/03)

green triangleLost in Translation: Public Health Implications of Sexual Health Research - A Congressional Briefing (3/04)

green triangleFrom SPIN: House Defeats Attempt to De-Fund Selected NIH Grants, Senate Debate Expected in September (7/03)

green triangleNIH Grants Targeted by House Amendment

green triangleTranscript of House Floor Debate on the Amendment offered by Rep. Toomey to Defund Five NIH Grants

See how your representative voted

Other links of interest:

NIH Responds to Congressional Inquiry [PDF 600K]*

NIH to Defend Dozens of Disputed Studies
USA TODAY

"Politics and Science" - Web site of Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA)

2002 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Promote Sexual Health and Responsible Sexual Behavior [PDF]*

*Requires free download of Adobe Reader. Get Adobe Acrobat Reader

 


SPIN logo
Subscribe to SPIN - APA's Science Policy Insider News and keep up to date on important policy issues that affect psychological science and psychological scientists at the national level.
Subscribe to SPIN

Man shouting through bullhornMake your voice heard! Join the APA's Public Policy Advocacy Network and help shape federal law and regulations by playing a key role in promoting advocacy initiatives of interest or concern to psychologists and the field as a whole.
Join the Public Policy Advocacy Network (PPAN)

Back to Top^

© 2008 American Psychological Association
750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242
Telephone: 800-374-2721; 202-336-5500. TDD/TTY: 202-336-6123
PsychNET® | Contact | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Security | Advertise with us