|
[Subscribe
to SPIN]
Getting the Candidates On Record for Science Over the past several months, there has been great interest
within the scientific community in getting the Presidential candidates on
record with regard to their views on science issues. Although both candidates
have expressed their views about science on their campaign websites and more
recently on the pages of Science (October 1 issue), stem cell research was the
only issue that received much attention during the debates. On September 30,
in a forum sponsored by the Washington Science Policy Alliance and held at
AAAS headquarters, representatives of both campaigns were invited to share the
views of their respective campaigns, followed by a Q&A session moderated
by Mary Woolley, President of Research!America (one of the coalitions that
figured prominently in the advocacy campaign to double the NIH budget). The
full exchange, as well as links to the campaign positions, is available on the
AAAS website.
Read
the full article
NIMH Implements Reorganization
On October 1st, the National Institute of Mental Health
began implementing a new organization structure that Director Tom Insel
says will seek to accelerate translational and interdisciplinary science,
to more clearly identify brain-behavior pathophysiology - and to translate
this knowledge into developing more effective interventions that target
symptoms and functioning. The new reorganization was formally announced at
the National Mental Health Advisory Council meeting on September 21st and
has raised some concern about the future of basic behavioral science at
the institute.
As concerns continue about the representation of
behavioral research and behavioral science staff, it will be increasingly
important for SPIN readers to urge qualified colleagues to apply for open
program positions. For more information on the latest open behavioral
scientist position, click here
and enter announcement number NIMH-04-0083.
Read
the full article from APA Science Directorate's Psychological Science
Agenda
New Recommendations for Youth Violence Prevention
Research
On Oct 13-15th, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH),
along with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other NIH
institutes, held a State-of-the-Science Conference to review the current
evidence base on preventing youth violence and related health-risking
social behaviors. Scientists from across the fields of psychology,
biology, criminology, sociology, economics and law, as well as members of
the public, participated in the three-day conference that resulted in a
draft report from the panel of outside scientists and experts, including
several well-known psychologists, to guide future intervention programs
and research agendas across the federal government.
Read
the full article
[back to top]
NSF Announces Second Round of Science of Learning Competition
On October 15th, The National Science Foundation (NSF) released the
solicitation for its second competition of the Science of Learning Centers
(SLC), a program that supports interdisciplinary investigations of
"psychological, social and pedagogical aspects of learning, the
biological basis of learning, machine learning, learning technologies, and
mathematical analyses and modeling of all of these." Awards include
large-scale center awards of up to ten years, as well as smaller catalyst
awards for projects NSF describes as "initial collaborative research
and partnership-building activities." Initial year awards were made
to two catalyst proposals (one on individual differences in learning and
the other on the study of problem solving in science, technology,
engineering and mathematics contexts) and three full centers. The
Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center will focus on robust learning with
learning experiments in real classrooms; the Learning in Informal and
Formal Environments (LIFE) Center at the University of Washington will
seek to guide the design of effective new learning technologies and
environments; and the Center for Learning in Education, Science, and
Technology (CELEST) will bring together multiple universities to
"study real-time autonomous learning systems by integrating
experimental and computational brain science, biologically inspired
technology, and classroom innovation."
For this next round of competition, catalyst proposals are
due January 14, 2005; preliminary proposals for centers are due February
24, and invited full proposals will be due on June 29 of next year.
More
information about the Science of Learning Centers
Sign
up for the SLC Public Announcements list by sending a blank e-mail
here
Science Policy Staff meet with Psychologists in Counterintelligence
On October 19th, Science Policy staffers Geoff Mumford and Heather Kelly held an
initial meeting with high-ranking psychologists within the Department of
Defense (DoD) Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA) to discuss
possible areas of collaboration. CIFA is designed to serve as a
defense-wide coordinator of counterintelligence activities, resource
allocation, budget planning, and policy implementation. The 2002 DoD
directive establishing CIFA describes the mission more specifically as to
develop and manage "programs and functions that support the
protection of…DoD personnel, resources, critical information, research
and development programs, technology, critical infrastructure, economic
security, and U.S. interests against foreign influence and manipulation,
as well as to detect and neutralize espionage against the
Department."
APA members are remarkably well-positioned within CIFA to
bring operational and research expertise to bear on counterintelligence
activities. Scott Shumate directs the Behavioral Sciences Directorate, and
within the Directorate Kirk Kennedy serves as Chief of the National Center
for the Study of Counterintelligence and Operational Psychology. Both are
very interested in highlighting psychology's contributions to national
security challenges and will continue to talk with Science PPO about
collaborative opportunities such as advisory panels, fellowships, and
training programs.
NIH Asks for Your Opinion
Science Policy staff are drafting APA comments on two
important issues this month. The first is the Strategic Plan for the
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). NCCAM
was formed from NIH's Office of Alternative Medicine in 1999 and has thus
arrived at the end of its first five-year strategic plan this year. NCCAM
has focused on methodically researching the efficacy and effectiveness of
such complementary and alternative practices as herbal supplements (e.g.,
St. John's Wort), chiropractic and osteopathic interventions, and the role
of meditation and prayer in health and healing. While most of NCCAM's
portfolio was clinically focused in the past, the Center is moving toward
a more balanced approach with additional basic research.
Read
the full article
Any questions?
If you have any questions regarding SPIN or specific
science policy issues, please feel free to contact any of APA’s Science
PPO staff.
Geoff
Mumford, Ph.D., Director of Science Policy
Pat
Kobor, Senior Science Policy Analyst
Heather
O'Beirne Kelly, Ph.D., Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer
Karen
Studwell, J.D., Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer
Sara
Robinson, Legislative Assistant
|