|
[Subscribe
to SPIN]
Dr. Tim Wilson Testifies on Behalf
of NSF Funding
On Wednesday, April 9th, APA member Timothy Wilson, PhD
presented APA's annual testimony in support of psychological research
before a House Appropriations Subcommittee in the U.S. Capitol. Dr.
Wilson, a social psychologist and Chair of the Psychology Department at
the University of Virginia, advocated for increased funding at three
federal agencies under the jurisdiction of the House VA-HUD Appropriations
Subcommittee: the National Science Foundation (NSF); National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA); and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
Dr. Wilson's testimony highlighted two large-scale grant
programs at NSF in FY04 - the Human and Social Dynamics research priority
area within NSF's Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate,
and the foundation-wide Science of Learning program. For more information
on each, see NSF's website.
Following the official testimony, Dr. Wilson and Dr. Heather Kelly, APA's
Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer, met with staff from Rep.
Virgil Goode's office (Republican Congressman from Virginia who sits on
the influential VA-HUD Appropriations Subcommittee) to get his support for
psychological science at NSF. Read the full testimony here.
Behavioral Science in the
Department of Homeland Security
On May 12, in our monthly meeting with the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), several representatives
from the behavioral and social science community met with Parney Albright,
former OSTP Assistant Director for Homeland & National Security.
Parney has formally transitioned to the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to work on "policy, plans, programs and budget" in the
Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate for the new Undersecretary,
Charles McQueary.
The organizational
chart for the S&T Directorate is evolving rapidly. One Assistant
Secretary will oversee the planning, policy, program and budget activities
and 3 other Assistant Secretaries will oversee the execution of S&T
Directorate activities within an Office of Research and Development; an
Office of Homeland Security Advanced Research Programs; and an Office of
Systems Development and Engineering. When fully staffed the S&T
Directorate will have approximately 180 staff with 75 of those involved in
various elements of planning and program activities. Program will be split
across several portfolios incorporating the behavioral elements described
below as well as programs to deal with a range of potential threats
including radiological/nuclear, biochemical and high explosives. The
remaining programs will support the other Directorates: Information
Analysis and Infrastructure Protection; Borders and Transportation; and
Emergency Preparedness and Emergency Response.
Parney described some of the current S&T programmatic
interests related to "determination of intent" (i.e., taking a
more scientific approach to understanding what it is that triggers the
attention of security personnel when they decide to question suspicious
persons); understanding root causes of terrorism and methods to quantify
the deterrent effect of countermeasures; understanding how and why people
react the way they do to warnings and alarms and what can be done to train
people to respond appropriately; understanding how terrorist networks
operate and what mechanisms can be used to disrupt them; understanding how
to apply "data-mining" techniques to low frequency terrorist
events; understanding public perceptions of personal identity and privacy;
and understanding effective "red teaming" (i.e., how to think
like the bad guys to successfully model different terrorist scenarios).
Other than "determination of intent", its not
clear which of the program areas are meant to receive dedicated funding
but research on determination of intent will be funded at $15 million in
this fiscal year and at about $25 million next year. Although Parney is a
physicist by training, he went out of his way to assure us that in the
S&T Directorate they understand that elements of behavioral and social
science suffuse a great deal of what DHS does. Howard Silver, Executive
Director of COSSA reminded Parney of a letter
drafted by several behavioral and social science groups and sent to
Secretary Ridge in April, advocating for an infrastructure within the
S&T Directorate much like the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences
Research (OBSSR) at
NIH. Although Parney said he wasn't ready to take that approach for a
variety of reasons, he was interested in nominations for a 20-member
scientific advisory board for the S&T Directorate.
In a meeting the previous week, Gary Strong, Director of
Behavioral Research within the S&T Directorate at DHS asked Geoff
Mumford, Director of Science Policy, to serve on an informal advisory
group with Susan Brandon; Program Chief, Affect & Biobehavioral
Regulation, DNBBS, NIMH; Norman Bradburn; Assistant Director SBE, National
Science Foundation; Phil Rubin; Division Director Behavioral and Cognitive
Sciences, NSF; and Ken Whang; Program Manager for Collaborative Research
on Computational Neurosciences, NSF.
Dr. Darlene Howard Testifies on Health and Education
Funding
On Wednesday, May 14th, APA member Darlene
Howard, PhD, of Georgetown University presented APA's testimony before the
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and
Education. Dr. Howard discussed issues related to funding for the NIH, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, and Graduate
Psychology Education. Chairman Ralph Regula (R-OH) was particularly
interested in hearing about research that has shown the cognitive benefits
of exercise. Read her testimony here.
[Back to top]
Dr. Steve Sellman Testifies on Behalf of DoD Research
Funding
On May 15th, APA member Steve Sellman, Vice President and
Director for Public Policy Issues at the Human Resources Research
Organization and former Director for Accession Policy in the Office of the
Secretary of Defense, presented APA's testimony before the Senate
Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. With over forty years of
experience in military personnel management and research, Dr. Sellman was
an ideal spokesman for the valuable contributions of psychological
scientists funded by the Department of Defense. Testimony focused on
proposed cuts in the President's Fiscal Year 2004 human-centered research
budgets for the military laboratories at a time when the need to
understand and optimize cognitive functioning, perceptual awareness,
complex decision-making, stress resilience, and human-systems interactions
has become even more mission-critical to the military. Read his testimony here.
Friends of NICHD Advocate for Increased Support for
NIH
The Friends of NICHD, co-chaired by APA's Karen Studwell,
submitted testimony before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor Health
and Human Services and Education on May 14th. The Coalition followed up that
testimony by visiting the offices of several key members of the House and Senate
Subcommittee to discuss the outlook for FY2004 appropriations May 19th. The
coalition of nearly 100 organizations met with congressional staff to educate
them about the broad research mission of NICHD and requested their support for
FY2004 appropriations of $30 billion for NIH and $1.32 billion for NICHD, which
represents approximately 10 percent increases. The Bush Administration has
proposed a 2.5 percent increase for NIH in FY2004, which it states will actually
result in a 7.5 increase for research funding by cutting back on some NIH
expenditures for facilities and infrastructure. To ensure increased funding for
NIH, congressional staff claim they will have to cut other health programs,
which are already slated for cuts in the President's budget. APA will continue
to work individually and through coalitions such as FNICHD to advocate for
increased support for NIH and its mission. Read the Friends of NICHD testimony here.
Psychological Researchers Present at National Academies
On May 14th the Committee on Law and Justice at the National
Academy of Sciences held the third in its series of Roundtables on Social and
Behavioral Sciences and Terrorism, in this case, examining the issue of
"Screening for Terrorists". In April, APA Science Policy staff
recommended several individuals with research experience relevant to the topic
and 4 of them were selected to present.
Charles Bond, Texas Christian University, presented on "Cross-cultural
Judgments of Deception"; Jack Glaser, University of California,
Berkeley, presented on "Psychological
Errors and Logical Pitfalls in Racial Profiling"; Andrew Silke, Home
Office, United Kingdom, presented on "Profiling Terrorists: Lessons from
Research"; Jonathan Drummond, Princeton University, presented on "How
Does One Become a Terrorist and What Marks the Process? Applications of a Theory
of Deviant Legitimation."
APA Coordinates Congressional Reception for New NIH Directors
Science Policy staff are coordinating a reception to officially welcome
the three new NIH Institute Directors of NIMH, NIAAA and NIDA to Capitol Hill on
May 22. The reception, co-sponsored by seventeen organizations which
collectively represent hundreds of thousands of scientists, healthcare providers
and patient advocates, is meant to raise the profile of the new Institute
Directors with Members of Congress and their staff. Although Drs. Insel and Li
were appointed last September, it took some time for them to transition to the
NIH and Dr. Volkow, who received her appointment in February, only arrived here
last month. Having transitioned to a new leadership role as well, Dr. Raynard
Kington, the Deputy Director of NIH will be on hand to introduce the new
Directors.
Any questions?
If you have any questions regarding SPIN or specific
science policy issues, please feel free to contact any of APA’s Science
PPO staff.
Geoff
Mumford, Ph.D., Director of Science Policy
Pat
Kobor, Senior Science Policy Analyst
Heather
O'Beirne Kelly, Ph.D., Senior Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer
Karen
Studwell, J.D., Legislative and Federal Affairs Officer
|