HOME SITE MAP CONTACT APA ONLINE
APA ONLINE Practice
Talking Points on the Flawed Privacy Provision in the Financial Services Bill


July 1999
Government Relations
Practice Directorate

For more information: E-mail


Action:

Please urge your Representative or Senator to strike the House medical information privacy provision in the Financial Services bill. This flawed provision would jeopardize the confidentiality of patient records and could preempt existing laws enacted by states to ensure records confidentiality for their residents.

Please call your member of Congress directly. If you do not have his/her direct line, you can reach the member through the congressional switchboard.

Senate Inquiries (202) 224-3121

House Inquiries (202) 225-3121

Background:

The House Banking Committee slipped the flawed privacy provision into its version of the Financial Services bill (H.R. 10) at the last moment before House passage. Specifically, the provision permits insurers, including health insurers, to access and disclose patient records for a wide range of purposes, such as for benefits administration and utilization review, without adequate patient consent. Key members of Congress are currently developing a compromise between the House and Senate bills.

Talking Points:

  • The House bill would allow various insurers, including health insurers, to access and disclose patient records without the consent of the patient in broad circumstances (such as for benefits administration and utilization review). Further, insurers will be allowed to share patient health records with other organizations including credit agencies and other financial institutions.Health insurers should not be able to routinely access and share patients' health records without patient consent or even knowledge.
  • State laws enacted to ensure consumer privacy could be preempted. As a new federal law when enacted, the medical records provision could potentially preempt state laws which specifically protect patient records from improper or unauthorized disclosure.
  • Violations of consumer confidentiality are particularly harmful to those seeking mental health services. Patients receiving mental health services have greater confidentiality needs for their records than persons receiving general health services. The House provision will deter many of these patients from seeking needed health care and from making disclosures of critical information needed for their treatments.
If you have further questions, please contact Ricky Dodd or David Nelson at the Practice Directorate's Government Relations Office at (202)336-5889.



© 2008 American Psychological Association
Practice Directorate
750 First Street, NE • Washington, DC • 20002-4242
Phone: 202-336-5800 • TDD/TTY: 202-336-6123
Fax: 202-336-5797 • Email
PsychNET® | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Security | Advertise with us