APA ONLINE HOME HOME SITE MAP CONTACT

Association Info Students psychology topics Publications Careers Press/News Join APA
 psychology topics
Addictions
ADHD
Aging
Alzheimer's
Anger
Anxiety
Autism
Bipolar disorder
Bullying
Children
Death & dying
Depression
Eating disorders
Emotional health
Ethics
Intelligence
Kids & the media
Law & psychology
Learning & memory
Marriage & divorce
Natural disasters
Obesity
Parenting
Personality
Posttraumatic stress disorder
Race
Schizophrenia
Sexual Abuse
Sexuality
Shyness
Sleep
Stress
Suicide
Teens
Testing issues
Trauma
Violence
Women & men
Workplace issues
Topics home
Rone v. Fireman, 473 F. Supp. 92
Brief Filed: 1/78
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division
Year of Decision: 1979

Issue: Whether the State had an obligation to treat persons confined to state mental hospitals in the least restrictive setting

Index Topics: Civil Commitment; Mentally Ill and Mentally Retarded (Rights of); Residential Treatment

Facts: This was a class action suit brought on behalf of all present, future, and discharged residents of Western Reserve Psychiatric Habilitation Center, a long-term state psychiatric hospital near Cleveland, Ohio. The lawsuit sought to improve conditions at the hospital and to establish that the state had an obligation to treat residents in the least restrictive setting, including an obligation to create the appropriate range of such settings where none exist.

APA's Position: APA submitted an amicus brief arguing that: (1) patients have a right to receive treatment in the least restrictive setting appropriate to their needs since implementation of the right to be free from harm requires the development of less restrictive settings for the treatment of mentally disordered persons; (2) implementation of the right to treatment must include an emphasis on treatment aimed at enabling a hospital patient to successfully return to and remain in the community; (3) defendants had a duty to plaintiffs to provide post-hospital care and services until such time as plaintiffs were able to overcome the regressive effects of the inhumane environment which has existed at WRPHC for years and that defendants should provide post-hospital care and services to all discharged patients as needed to prevent the erosion of therapeutic benefits gained in the hospital; and (4) the court should take an active and vigorous role in correcting any inhumane conditions at WRPHC as well as the inadequate services provided by dependents.

Results: Prior to resolution of this case, the Ohio legislature enacted a patients' rights law. The district court analyzed the evidence in light of the new law and issued numerous orders for compliance with the new law.


PsycLAW Homepage



© 2008 American Psychological Association
750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242
Telephone: 800-374-2721; 202-336-5500. TDD/TTY: 202-336-6123
PsychNET® | Contact | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Security | Advertise with us