Results 1–10 of 21 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Examining emotion's impact" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (14)Marriage & divorce (6)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (5)HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1) 3 more... [+] Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (5)2012 (3)2011 (6)2010 (4) Results 1–10 of 21 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)2.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)3.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)4.APA Amicus Briefs by IssueListing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Each of the titles below links to a one-page summary.Amicus Brief 5.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)6.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)7.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)8.Perry v. SchwarzeneggerChallenge to Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act).Amicus Brief (October 2010)9.Golinski v. Office of Personnel ManagementGay and lesbian parents are not any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents, and that their children are not less adjusted. The brief also addresses how denying federal recognition to legally married same-sex couples stigmatizes them.Amicus Brief (July 2012)10.Hollingsworth v. PerryAddresses a challenge to Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) that says “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”Amicus Brief (February 2013) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 21 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Examining emotion's impact"