Results 1–10 of 20 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Calling all scientists: APA and FABBS..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (13)Marriage & divorce (6)Sexuality (6)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (4)Abortion (1) 7 more... [+] HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (5)2012 (4)2011 (4)2010 (4) Results 1–10 of 20 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 2.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 3.Donaldson v. MontanaThe brief concerned the protection of state-recognized domestic partnerships in the state constitution’s provisions such as its guarantees of equal protection and privacy.Amicus Brief (November 2011)4.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)5.Commonwealth v. WalkerAPA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Amicus Brief (August 2011)6.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)7.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)8.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)9.Planned Parenthood et al. v. Mike Rounds et al.This brief (which was submitted but not accepted) addresses a law requirng physicians to warn women considering an abortion that suicide or suicidal ideation are known medical risks of abortion.Amicus Brief (April 2010)10.Griego v. Oliver Whether the New Mexico Constitution compels the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.Amicus Brief (September 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 20 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Calling all scientists: APA and FABBS..."