Results 1–10 of 26 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "The tunes they are a-changin’" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (18)Marriage & divorce (7)Sexuality (7)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (5)Abortion (1) 7 more... [+] HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (7)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (5) Results 1–10 of 26 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)2.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)3.Planned Parenthood et al. v. Mike Rounds et al.This brief (which was submitted but not accepted) addresses a law requirng physicians to warn women considering an abortion that suicide or suicidal ideation are known medical risks of abortion.Amicus Brief (April 2010)4.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)5.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)6.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)7.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex. Amicus Brief (October 2013)8.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)9.Commonwealth v. WalkerAPA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Amicus Brief (August 2011)10.Donaldson v. MontanaThe brief concerned the protection of state-recognized domestic partnerships in the state constitution’s provisions such as its guarantees of equal protection and privacy.Amicus Brief (November 2011) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 26 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "The tunes they are a-changin’"