Results 15 of 5 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Politics, science and the suppression..."

Document Type

  • Amicus BriefX

Year

Results 15 of 5
Sort by:
  • 1.Floyd v. Cain
    Research and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.
    Amicus Brief (May 2010)
  • 2.Connecticut v. Artis
    Whether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation.
    Amicus Brief (October 2013)
  • 3.Perry v. New Hampshire
    On August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action.
    Amicus Brief (August 2011)
  • 4.Michigan v. Kowalski
    APA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.
    Amicus Brief (September 2011)
  • 5.Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs
    APA's brief discusses life-without-parole sentencing for juveniles in homicide cases.
    Amicus Brief (January 2012)
Sort by:
ADVERTISEMENT
Results 15 of 5 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Politics, science and the suppression..."