Results 1–10 of 14 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Lo Que Las Niñas y Jóvenes Sí Pueden..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (10)Sexuality (7)Marriage & divorce (6)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (5)Human rights (2) 4 more... [+] Intelligence (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (6)2012 (3)2011 (1)2010 (1) Results 1–10 of 14 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Perry v. SchwarzeneggerChallenge to Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act).Amicus Brief (October 2010)2.Hollingsworth v. PerryAddresses a challenge to Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) that says “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”Amicus Brief (February 2013)3.Golinski v. Office of Personnel ManagementGay and lesbian parents are not any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents, and that their children are not less adjusted. The brief also addresses how denying federal recognition to legally married same-sex couples stigmatizes them.Amicus Brief (July 2012)4.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 5.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 6.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex. Amicus Brief (October 2013)7.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)8.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)9.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)10.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 14 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Lo Que Las Niñas y Jóvenes Sí Pueden..."