Results 1–9 of 9 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "From the CEO--Psychology in the public..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (7)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (1) 3 more... [+] Marriage & divorce (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (4)2011 (2) Results 1–9 of 9 Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Commonwealth v. WalkerAPA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Amicus Brief (August 2011)2.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)3.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)4.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 5.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)6.APA Amicus Briefs by IssueListing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Each of the titles below links to a one-page summary.Amicus Brief 7.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)8.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 9.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013) Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–9 of 9 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "From the CEO--Psychology in the public..."