Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Is research at risk?" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (19)Sexuality (8)Marriage & divorce (7)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (6)Human rights (2) 8 more... [+] Abortion (1)HIV & AIDS (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (7)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (6) Results 1–10 of 27 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Planned Parenthood et al. v. Mike Rounds et al.This brief (which was submitted but not accepted) addresses a law requirng physicians to warn women considering an abortion that suicide or suicidal ideation are known medical risks of abortion.Amicus Brief (April 2010)2.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)3.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)4.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 5.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 6.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)7.APA Amicus Briefs by IssueListing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Each of the titles below links to a one-page summary.Amicus Brief 8.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)9.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)10.Rivera v. Illinois, 2-09-1060APA described research on false confessions and factors that lead to them, such as length of interrogation, mental illness, and low IQ.Amicus Brief (July 2010) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Is research at risk?"