Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Preparing patients for spinal surgery" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (6)Marriage & divorce (2)Sexuality (2)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1) 3 more... [+] Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (3)2011 (2) Results 1–8 of 8 Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 2.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 3.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)4.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)5.APA Amicus Briefs by IssueListing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Each of the titles below links to a one-page summary.Amicus Brief 6.Donaldson v. MontanaThe brief concerned the protection of state-recognized domestic partnerships in the state constitution’s provisions such as its guarantees of equal protection and privacy.Amicus Brief (November 2011)7.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)8.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013) Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Preparing patients for spinal surgery"