Results 1–10 of 15 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Juries, not judges, to determine facts..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (9)HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1) 5 more... [+] Marriage & divorce (1)Sexuality (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (3)2012 (2)2011 (3)2010 (4) Results 1–10 of 15 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs APA's brief discusses life-without-parole sentencing for juveniles in homicide cases.Amicus Brief (January 2012)2.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)3.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 4.Floyd v. CainResearch and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.Amicus Brief (May 2010)5.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 6.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)7.APA Amicus Briefs by IssueListing of the amicus briefs by issues such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Each of the titles below links to a one-page summary.Amicus Brief 8.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)9.Brown (formerly Schwarzenegger) v. Plata et alClass action cases by mentally and physically ill California prisoners challenging imprisonment conditions due to overcrowding, including lack of adequate mental health services.Amicus Brief (November 2010)10.Griego v. Oliver Whether the New Mexico Constitution compels the state to allow same-sex couples the freedom to marry.Amicus Brief (September 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 15 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Juries, not judges, to determine facts..."