Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Pheromones, in context" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (20)Marriage & divorce (8)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (7)Human rights (2)HIV & AIDS (1) 6 more... [+] Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2014 (1)2013 (7)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (5) Results 1–10 of 27 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)2.Kitchen v. Herbert and Bishop v. SmithInvolves a federal challenge to Utah and Oklahoma’s laws prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying and recognition of the legal marriage of same-sex couples who married in other states.Amicus Brief (March 2014)3.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)4.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)5.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 6.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 7.Brown (formerly Schwarzenegger) v. Plata et alClass action cases by mentally and physically ill California prisoners challenging imprisonment conditions due to overcrowding, including lack of adequate mental health services.Amicus Brief (November 2010)8.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)9.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)10.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Pheromones, in context"