Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Overcoming invisibility" Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (19)Sexuality (8)Marriage & divorce (7)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (6)Human rights (2) 8 more... [+] Abortion (1)HIV & AIDS (1)Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (7)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (6) Results 1–10 of 27 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)2.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)3.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)4.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 5.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 6.Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs APA's brief discusses life-without-parole sentencing for juveniles in homicide cases.Amicus Brief (January 2012)7.Perry v. SchwarzeneggerChallenge to Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act).Amicus Brief (October 2010)8.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)9.Rivera v. Illinois, 2-09-1060APA described research on false confessions and factors that lead to them, such as length of interrogation, mental illness, and low IQ.Amicus Brief (July 2010)10.Hollingsworth v. PerryAddresses a challenge to Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) that says “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”Amicus Brief (February 2013) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 27 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Overcoming invisibility"