Results 1–10 of 21 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Experts testify on the importance of..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (13)Marriage & divorce (6)Sexuality (6)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (4)Abortion (1) 3 more... [+] HIV & AIDS (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (5)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (4) Results 1–10 of 21 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.People v. ThomasAt issue in the appeal is whether the State of New York should allow expert testimony on the body of research addressing risk factors for false confessions.Amicus Brief (November 2013)2.Michigan v. KowalskiAPA’s brief supports scientific research on false confessions provides a strong empirical foundation for the admission of expert testimony on the subject and that it should be admitted as evidence under the Daubert standard for expert testimony.Amicus Brief (September 2011)3.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 4.Commonwealth v. WalkerAPA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Amicus Brief (August 2011)5.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 6.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)7.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011)8.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)9.Floyd v. CainResearch and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.Amicus Brief (May 2010)10.Planned Parenthood et al. v. Mike Rounds et al.This brief (which was submitted but not accepted) addresses a law requirng physicians to warn women considering an abortion that suicide or suicidal ideation are known medical risks of abortion.Amicus Brief (April 2010) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 21 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Experts testify on the importance of..."