Results 1–10 of 19 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Psychological Science and Bipolar..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (12)Marriage & divorce (5)Sexuality (5)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (3)Abortion (1) 6 more... [+] HIV & AIDS (1)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (4)2012 (4)2011 (3)2010 (5) Results 1–10 of 19 Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)2.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)3.Warney v. New York, CA 08 02261This case involves Douglas Warney, a man with mental retardation and AIDS-related dementia who was convicted of murder based solely on a false confession.Amicus Brief (July 2010)4.Floyd v. CainResearch and psychological science indicate that not every voluntary confession is true. The brief also addresses why innocent people confess and how voluntary false confessions are difficult for judges, juries and others to discern.Amicus Brief (May 2010)5.Rivera v. Illinois, 2-09-1060APA described research on false confessions and factors that lead to them, such as length of interrogation, mental illness, and low IQ.Amicus Brief (July 2010)6.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)7.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)8.Planned Parenthood et al. v. Mike Rounds et al.This brief (which was submitted but not accepted) addresses a law requirng physicians to warn women considering an abortion that suicide or suicidal ideation are known medical risks of abortion.Amicus Brief (April 2010)9.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)10.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex. Amicus Brief (October 2013) Previous 1 2 Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 19 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Psychological Science and Bipolar..."