Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Dialogues on Difference: Studies of..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (5)Human rights (1)Intelligence (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1) 1 more... [+] Violence (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (1)2012 (2)2011 (2)2010 (1) Results 1–8 of 8 Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012)2.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)3.APA Amicus Briefs by YearListing in reverse chronological order of APA amicus briefs, on subjects such as sexual orientation, psychotherapist-patient privilege and the death penalty. Each of the titles links to a one-page summary. Amicus Brief 4.APA Amicus Briefs in Alphabetical OrderListing of the amicus briefs in alphabetical order, including topics such as sexual orientation, gays in the military, abortion and confidentiality. Amicus Brief 5.Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs APA's brief discusses life-without-parole sentencing for juveniles in homicide cases.Amicus Brief (January 2012)6.Brown (formerly Schwarzenegger) v. Plata et alClass action cases by mentally and physically ill California prisoners challenging imprisonment conditions due to overcrowding, including lack of adequate mental health services.Amicus Brief (November 2010)7.Hall v. FloridaAt issue in the appeal is whether a statutory definition of mental retardation that has a bright-line cutoff requiring an IQ score of 70 or below adequately captures the constitutional imperative that the “mentally retarded” not be executed.Amicus Brief (December 2013)8.Coble v. TexasA case on the reliability of expert testimony (on risk of “future dangerousness”) in a death penalty case.Amicus Brief (May 2011) Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–8 of 8 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Dialogues on Difference: Studies of..."