Results 1–10 of 23 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Senior Director's Column: Pole Sitting..." Refine Your Search Refine Your Search TopicLaw & psychology (18)Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (6)Marriage & divorce (6)Human rights (2)HIV & AIDS (1) 6 more... [+] Intelligence (1)Learning & memory (1)Teens (1)Testing issues (1)Violence (1)Women & men (1)Hide detailsDocument TypeAmicus BriefXYear2013 (6)2012 (4)2011 (6)2010 (4) Results 1–10 of 23 Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: 1.Rivera v. Illinois, 2-09-1060APA described research on false confessions and factors that lead to them, such as length of interrogation, mental illness, and low IQ.Amicus Brief (July 2010)2.Connecticut v. ArtisWhether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation. Amicus Brief (October 2013)3.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex. Amicus Brief (October 2013)4.Perry v. New HampshireOn August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action. Amicus Brief (August 2011)5.Donaldson v. MontanaThe brief concerned the protection of state-recognized domestic partnerships in the state constitution’s provisions such as its guarantees of equal protection and privacy.Amicus Brief (November 2011)6.APA Amicus BriefsLinks to amicus briefs submitted by APA on a variety of subjects, including sexual orientation, psychologist scope of practice, hospital privileges, and involuntary committal to mental hospitals.Amicus Brief 7.U.S. v. WindsorAt challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (March 2013)8.Windsor v. U.S.At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.Amicus Brief (September 2012)9.Golinski v. Office of Personnel ManagementGay and lesbian parents are not any less fit or capable than heterosexual parents, and that their children are not less adjusted. The brief also addresses how denying federal recognition to legally married same-sex couples stigmatizes them.Amicus Brief (July 2012)10.Fisher v. University of Texas at AustinThe brief explains whether the US Supreme Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions.Amicus Brief (August 2012) Previous 1 2 3 ... Next Relevance Title A-Z Title Z-A Newest First Oldest First Sort by: ADVERTISEMENT Results 1–10 of 23 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Senior Director's Column: Pole Sitting..."