Results 110 of 20 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Interpersonal Psychotherapy"
Results 110 of 20
Previous 1 2 Next Sort by:
  • 1.Connecticut v. Artis
    Whether the Appellate Court majority properly determined that admission of the victim’s in-court and out-of-court identifications following a suggestive police display of the defendant’s photograph was a reversible due process violation.
    Amicus Brief (October 2013)
  • 2.Sevcik v. Sandoval and Jackson v. Abercrombie
    This case challenges whether the Equal Protection Clause, part of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, does not prohibit the state from limiting marriage to people of the opposite sex.
    Amicus Brief (October 2013)
  • 3.Donaldson v. Montana
    The brief concerned the protection of state-recognized domestic partnerships in the state constitution’s provisions such as its guarantees of equal protection and privacy.
    Amicus Brief (November 2011)
  • 4.APA Amicus Briefs
    Links to amicus briefs submitted by APA on a variety of subjects, including sexual orientation, psychologist scope of practice, hospital privileges, and involuntary committal to mental hospitals.
    Amicus Brief
  • 5.Perry v. New Hampshire
    On August 5, 2011, APA filed an amicus brief providing the Court with an overview of the research on the accuracy of eyewitness identification and suggestive circumstances that will affect eyewitness identification can occur without police action.
    Amicus Brief (August 2011)
  • 6.Commonwealth v. Walker
    APA filed an amicus brief urging the court to allow expert testimony on psychological research regarding eyewitness testimony, juror misunderstanding of the accuracy of eyewitness identification and the factors that can affect the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.
    Amicus Brief (August 2011)
  • 7.U.S. v. Windsor
    At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term "marriage," for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife," and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.
    Amicus Brief (March 2013)
  • 8.Windsor v. U.S.
    At challenge is the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the term 'marriage,' for all federal purposes, as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and thus requires the federal government to disregard marriages of same-sex couples.
    Amicus Brief (September 2012)
  • 9.Perry v. Schwarzenegger
    Challenge to Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act).
    Amicus Brief (October 2010)
  • 10.Hollingsworth v. Perry
    Addresses a challenge to Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) that says “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”
    Amicus Brief (February 2013)
Previous 1 2 Next Sort by:
ADVERTISEMENT
Results 110 of 20 for "Amicus Brief"X related to "Interpersonal Psychotherapy"