Bibliography

IRBs and Psychological Science (Report of a BSA Working Group)

Sales, B. D. & Folkman, S. (2000). Ethics in Research With Human Participants.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Comments on the draft of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission's (NBAC) report on Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants

Comments on the petition for rulemaking to amend the definition of animal in the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) regulations to remove the current exclusion of rats, mice, and birds (Docket No. 98-106-1)

Comments on the proposed definitions for and reporting of pain and distress (Docket No. 00-005-1) submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)

United States General Accounting Office (1996). Scientific Research: Continued Vigilance Critical to Protecting Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Author.

United States Department of Health and Human Services (1998). Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform. Washington, DC: Author.

United States Department of Health and Human Services (2000). Protecting Human Research Subjects: Status of Recommendations. Washington, DC: Author

National Bioethics Advisory Commission (2001). Ethical and Policy Issuesin Research Involving Human Participants. Bethesda, MD: Author.

Ethical Issues in Research with Human Participants: A comprehensive bibliography developed by an interagency working group and part of the Current Bibliographies in Medicine Series, hosted by the National Library of Medicine.