skip to main content

More than a decade ago, the American Psychological Association examined the role of psychology in understanding and responding to climate change in the report of its Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change (APA, 2009; “Psychology and global climate change,” 2011).  Following that report, the Council of Representatives adopted as APA policy the Resolution on Affirming Psychologists’ Role in Addressing Global Climate Change (APA, 2011), which serves as the foundation of the association’s work on the topic. 

Among its efforts, APA has sponsored the review and dissemination of research on the mental health impacts of climate change (Clayton, Manning, & Hodge, 2014; Clayton et al., 2017). In 2017, APA became an observer organization of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and, in that role, sends representatives to IPCC meetings and nominates contributors and reviewers for IPCC reports. Further, APA cohosted the 2019 International Summit on Psychology and Global Health in Portugal, which was designed to advance the contribution of psychology to United Nations Sustainable Goal 13 (“Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts”) (United Nations General Assembly, 2015). At this summit, representatives of 44 national and international psychological associations signed a resolution committing their organizations to action on climate change (“Resolution,” 2019).

Current scientific evidence strongly indicates that climate change has become a crisis: unless major reductions are made in emissions of greenhouse gases due to human activities, average surface temperatures on Earth are projected to increase within the next 30 years to 1.5 degrees C. above pre-industrial levels, with serious impacts on life throughout the planet (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018; Otto et al., 2020). The negative impacts of climate change on the health and well-being of individuals, communities, and nations are growing more frequent and severe, with members of some groups – including persons of color, persons of lower socioeconomic status, women, older adults, children, and persons with disabilities – at greater risk than others (Clayton, Manning, Krygsman, & Speiser, 2017; Lancet, 2019; U.S. Global Change Research Program, 2016, 2018; World Health Organization, 2019). The health and survival of nonhuman animals are threatened by climate change as well (Graham, Matthews, & Turner, 2016; Radchuk et al., 2019).

Recent research on the psychological dimensions of climate change can guide new action to mitigate and promote human adaptation to climate change. Among the areas that have been investigated are beliefs, attitudes, and communications about climate change and about policies and practices for addressing it; behavior change regarding energy use and conservation; and mental health and psychosocial consequences of climate change and related natural disasters, including pathways to coping and resilience (see bibliography below).

Building on such work, APA can further address the climate change crisis by promoting and sponsoring advances in research; interventions; services; education and training; public policy, law, and advocacy; group and community organization; and other domains in which psychologists work. All areas of psychology have valuable knowledge and experience to contribute to this effort.

Therefore, APA reaffirms its 2011 policy resolution and commits itself to continued action to address global climate change on the basis of scientific evidence and applied and clinical psychological expertise.

Further, APA adopts an interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach to addressing climate change, including collaborations with other scientific, professional, policy, and community organizations in the United States and internationally.

Further, the President of APA shall appoint a task force, composed of leading international experts, to review APA's past and current activities related to global climate change and to recommend goals and strategies for future APA activities that will have a strong impact on the climate change crisis. The Council of Representatives requests that the task force keep in mind the prime importance of issues surrounding migration, human rights, and systemic aspects (including political, economic, and corporate) of climate change, as well as address how APA can improve its own sustainability practices. The task force will submit a report to the Council of Representatives, and the report will be disseminated to the membership of APA.

References

American Psychological Association (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges (Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change ). https://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change

American Psychological Association (2011). Resolution on affirming psychologists' role in addressing global climate change. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/climate-change

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., & Hodge C. (2014). Beyond storms and droughts: The psychological impacts of climate change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica. https://ecoamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/eA_Beyond_Storms_and_Droughts_Psych_Impacts_of_Climate_Change.pdfopens in new window

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/03/mental-health-climate.pdfopens in new window

Graham, T.L., Matthews, H.D., & Turner, S.E. (2016). A global-scale evaluation of primate exposure and vulnerability to climate change. International Journal of Primatology, 37(2), 158-174.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/opens in new window

Lancet (2019). The  Lancet  countdown on health and climate change. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32596-6/fulltextopens in new window

Otto, I.M., Donges, J.F., Cremades, R., Bhowmik, A., ... Schellnhuber, H.J. (2020). Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing earth's climate by 2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (5), 2354-2365.

Psychology and global climate change [Special issue]. (2011). American Psychologist, 66 (4).

Radchuk, V, Reed, T., Teplitsky, C., van de Pol, M., … Kramer-Schadt, S. (2019). Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient. Nature Communications, 10, 3109.  

Resolution (2019). International Summit on Psychology and Global Health: A Leader in Climate Action (Lisbon, Portugal).

United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015: 70/1). https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=Eopens in new window, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/opens in new window

U.S. Global Change Research Program (2016). The impacts of climate change on human health in the United States: A scientific assessment. https://health2016.globalchange.govopens in new window

U.S. Global Change Research Program (2018). Fourth national climate assessment. Volume II: Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States. https://nca2018.globalchange.govopens in new window

World Health Organization (2019). WHO health and climate change survey report: Tracking global progress. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/who-health-and-climate-change-survey-report-tracking-global-progressopens in new window

Bibliography: Recent Psychological Research on Climate Change

(Note: This list, prepared in February 2020, is not intended to be exhaustive.)

Beliefs, attitudes and communication

Brenner, I., & Brenner, L. (Eds.) (2019). Climate change and the human factor [Special issue]. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 16 (2).  

Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., Fraser, J., & Flinner, K. (2017). Catalyzing public engagement with climate change through informal science learning centers. Science Communication, 39 (2), 221–249.

Goldberg, M.H., van der Linden, S., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019, online). Perceived social consensus can reduce ideological biases on climate change. Environment and Behavior.

Goldberg, M.H., van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (30), 14804-14805.

Hagmann, D., Ho, E.H., & Loewenstein, G. (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax.  Nature Climate Change, 9, 484-489.

Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6 (6), 622–626.

Howell, R., Capstick, S. B., & Whitmarsh, L. E. (2016). Impacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation. Climatic Change, 136 (3-4), 445–461.

Jost, J. T. (2018). Underestimating belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8,  189–190.

Kotcher, J., Maibach, E. & Choi, W.-T. (2019). Fossil fuels are harming our brains: Identifying key messages about the health effects of air pollution from fossil fuels. BMC Public Health, 19, 1079.

Markowitz, E.M., & Guckian, M. (2018). Climate change communication: Challenges, insights and opportunities. In S. Clayton & C. Manning (Eds.), Psychology and climate change. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1 (2), 1600008.

Whitmarsh, L., & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42, 122-135.

Behavior change

Amel, E., Manning, C., Scott, B., & Koger, S. (2017). Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science, 21 (Vol. 356, Issue 6335), 275-279.

Attari, S. Z., Krantz, D. H., & Weber, E. U. (2016). Energy conservation goals: What people adopt, what they recommend, and why. Judgment and Decision Making, 11 (4), 342-351

Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W.F., Azevedo, I.M.L., …Weber, E.U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8, 260–263.

Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA).  Psychological Review, 125 (2), 245–269.

Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015). The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141 (6), 1205–1227.

Maki, A., Carrico, A.R., Raimi, K.T., Truelove, H.B., Araujo, B., & Yeung, K.L. (2019). Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nature Sustainability, 2, 307–315.

Sanguinetti, A., Karlin, B., & Ford R. (2018). Understanding the path to smart home adoption: Segmenting and describing consumers across the innovation-decision process. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 274-283.

van Valkengoed, A.M., & Steg, L. (2019). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behavior. Nature Climate Change, 9 , 158–163.

Verplanken, B., & Roy, D. (2016). Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 45 , 127–134. 7-19.65, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors.  

Mental health and psychosocial consequences

Capielo Rosario, C., Abreu, R., Gonzalez, K., & Cardenas, E. (in press). “That day no one spoke”: Florida Puerto Ricans' reaction to Hurricane María. The Counseling Psychologist .

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2017/03/mental-health-climate.pdfopens in new window

Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N.R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8 , 275–281.

Evans, G.W. (2019). Projected behavioral impacts of global climate change. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 449-474.

Hayes, K., & Poland, B. (2018). Addressing mental health in a changing climate: Incorporating mental health indicators into climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (9), 1806.

Obradovich, N., Migliorini, R., Paulus, M.P., & Rahwan, I. (2018). Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115 (43), 10953-10958.

Shultz, J.M., Rechkemmer, A., Rai, A., & McManus, K.T. (2019). Public health and mental health implications of environmentally induced forced migration. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 13 (2), 116-122.

Date created: 2020