skip to main content

Data by Cycle

Fall 2016 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries

  • 243 of 300 (81.00%)   sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up. 
  • 126 of 243 (51.85%)  sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1  
  • 100 of 300 (33.33%)   sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up  

Note: Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR). 


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=300)

  • 10.00 % of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 81.00 % of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=243)
    • 51.85 % of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=126) 
    • 41.15 % of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=100) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 9.00 % of sponsors did not require feedback (n=27) 

Note. AR = Annual Report; CE = Continuing Education.

Spring 2017 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries

  • 239 of 291(82.13%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up 
  • 183 of 239 (85.57%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1  
  • 86 of 291 (29.55%) sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of all ARs (n=291)

  • 7.90% of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities  
  • 82.13% of sponsors received Round 1 follow-up (n=239)  
    • 86.57% of sponsors resolved Round 1 queries (n=183)
    • 29.21% of sponsors received Round 2 follow-up (n=86)
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses 
  • 10.31% of sponsors did not require feedback (n=30)  

Note. AR = Annual Report; CE = Continuing Education.

Fall 2017 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries 

  • 209 of 266 (78.57%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up 
  • 23 of 209 (11.00%)  sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 93 of 266 (34.96%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of all ARs (n=266) 

  • 6.39% of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 78.57% of sponsors received Round 1 follow-up (n=209) 
    • 11.00% of sponsors resolved Round 1 queries (n=23) 
    • 34.96% of sponsors received Round 2 follow-up (n=93)
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses 
  • 15.41% of sponsors did not require feedback (n=41) 

Note. AR = Annual Report; CE = Continuing Education.

Spring 2018 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries 

  • 170 of 267 (63.67%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up
  • 49 of 170 (28.82%)  sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1
  • 105 of 267 (39.33%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process

Systematic review of all ARs (n=267)

  • 4.87% of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities
  • 63.67% of sponsors received a Round 1 follow-up (n=170)
    • 28.82% of sponsors resolved Round 1 queries (n=49)
    • 39.33% of sponsors received Round 2 follow-up (n=105)
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 13.11% of sponsors did not require feedback (n=35)

Note. AR = Annual Report; CE = Continuing Education.

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window

Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for S18 Programs: B-F

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

3

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

239

Unclear expertise of instructor

8

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

 49

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

 45

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

0

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

2

Insufficient addressing of limitations

7

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

15
Unclear passing criterion  2

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

49

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

3

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

10

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

34

Improper recording of CE programs

0

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

15

Note. The annual report analyses for Spring 2018 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. CE=Continuing Education; S18=Spring 2018.

Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for S18 Programs: G

Standard

Issue

Count

G

 

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

154
Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval 74
Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials 25
Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours) 16
Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program) 1
Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials 97
Missing or incomplete activity log 2

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format)

6
Technical Issues Issues with submissions of Annual Report (e.g., materials unable to be opened by the CESA Office) 40

Note. The annual report analysis for Spring 2018 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. 1Inappropriate or missing promotional materials total slightly elevated due to OAS system errors. CEU=Continuing Education Units; S18 = Spring 2018.

Fall 2018 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 199 of 286 (69.6%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 75 of 286 (26.2%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 85 of 286 (29.7%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=286)  

  • 12.2%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 69.6%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=199) 
    • 26.1%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=75) 
    • 29.6%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=85) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 17.1%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=49) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window

Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for F18 Programs: B-F

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

5

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

790

Unclear expertise of instructor

13

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

202

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

232

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

3

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

16

Insufficient addressing of limitations

23

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

19

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

208

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

39

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

74

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

144

Improper recording of CE programs

7

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

136

Note. The annual report analysis for Fall 2018 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. CE=Continuing Education; F18 = Fall 2018. 

Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for F18 Programs: G

Standard

Issue

Count

G

 

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

603
Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval 330
Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials 153
Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours) 91
Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program) 3
Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials 372
Missing or incomplete activity log 27

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format)

14

Note. The annual report analysis for Fall 2018 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. 1Inappropriate or missing promotional materials total slightly elevated due to OAS system errors. CE = Continuing Education Units; F18=Fall 2018.

Spring 2019 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 207 of 285 (72.6%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 78 of 285 (26.2%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 70 of 285 (24.6%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=285)  

  • 9.5%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 72.6%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=207) 
    • 27.4%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=78) 
    • 24.6%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=70) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 19.3%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=55) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window



Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for S19 Programs: B-G



Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

0

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

160

Unclear expertise of instructor

0

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

29

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

22

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

0

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

6

Insufficient addressing of limitations

2

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

13

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

33

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

3

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

11

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

15

Improper recording of CE programs

1

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

14

G

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

116

Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval

15

Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials

22

Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours)

14

Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program)

1

Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials

55

Missing or incomplete activity log

3

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format) 

4
  

Note. The annual report analysis for Spring 2019 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. 1 Inappropriate or missing promotional materials total slightly elevated due to Online Application System (OAS) system errors. CEU = Continuing Education Units; S19= Spring 2019.

Fall 2019 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 158 of 261 (60.5%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 104 of 261 (39.8%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 40 of 261 (15.3%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=261)  

  • 6.9%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 60.5%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=207) 
    • 39.8%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=78) 
    • 15.3%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=70) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 35.2%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=55) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window



Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for F19 Programs: B-G

 

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

0

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

90

Unclear expertise of instructor

3

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

26

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

28

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

0

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

3

Insufficient addressing of limitations

1

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

16

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

12

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

1

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

5

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

9

Improper recording of CE programs

0

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

6

G

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

42

Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval

15

Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials

9

Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours)

5

Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program)

0

Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials

29

Missing or incomplete activity log

0

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format) 

1

Note. The annual report analysis for Fall 2019 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles.1 Inappropriate or missing promotional materials total slightly elevated due to Online Application System (OAS) system errors. CEU = Continuing Education Units; F19 = Fall 2019.

Spring 2020 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 205 of 305 (60.5%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 100 of 305 (39.8%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 60 of 305 (15.3%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).

Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=305)  

  • 1.9%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 67.3%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=207) 
    • 32.8%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=78) 
    • 19.7%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=70) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 32.5%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=55) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window



Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for S20 Programs: B-G

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

2

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

95

Unclear expertise of instructor

2

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

53

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

42

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

1

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

2

Insufficient addressing of limitations

1

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

10

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

28

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

2

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

10

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

15

Improper recording of CE programs

1

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

11

G

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

83

Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval

34

Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials

17

Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours)

10

Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program)

1

Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials

46

Missing or incomplete activity log

2

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format) 

1

Note. The annual report analysis for Spring 2020 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. 1 Inappropriate or missing promotional materials total slightly elevated due to Online Application System (OAS) system errors. CEU = Continuing Education Units; S20 = Spring 2020.

Fall 2020 Data

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 163 of 283 (57.6%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 120 of 283 (42.4%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 61 of 283 (21.6%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=283)  

  • 9.9%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 57.6%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=207) 
    • 42.4%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=78) 
    • 21.6%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=70) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 29.3%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=55) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

See: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window



Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for F20 Programs: B-G

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

2

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

 114

Unclear expertise of instructor

2

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

 25

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

49

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

0

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

3

Insufficient addressing of limitations

1

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

26

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

3

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

1

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

24

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

12

Improper recording of CE programs

0

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

18

G

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials

72

Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval

37

Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials

29

Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours)

11

Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program)

1

Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials

16

Missing or incomplete activity log

1

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format) 

3

Note. The annual report analysis for Fall 2020 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. CEU = Continuing Education Units; F20 = Fall 2020.

Spring 2021

Resolution of Round 1 Queries  

  • 168 of 316 (53.2%)  sponsors had queries related to standards that required follow-up  
  • 148 of 316 (46.8%) sponsors resolved queries highlighted in Round 1 
  • 19 of 316 (6%)  sponsors had continued queries that required follow-up

Note. Some sponsors received guidance related to their annual report (AR) that did not require Round 2 responses and thus were not included in any analyses featured in this presentation (e.g., additional information might have been included that was not relevant to AR).


Summary of AR Process 

Systematic Review of All ARs (n=316)  

  • 13.6%  of sponsors withdrew from CE sponsorship or did not offer CE activities 
  • 53.2%  of sponsors received round 1 follow-up (n=207) 
    • 46.8%  of sponsors resolved round 1 queries (n=78) 
    • 6%  of sponsors received round 2 follow-up (n=70) 
    • Some sponsors received a second round of correspondence related to their AR that did not require a response and were removed from all analyses
  • 36.1%  of sponsors did not require feedback (n=55) 

Description of Standards

A – Goals
B – Program Management
C – Educational Planning and Instructional Methods
D – Curriculum Content
E – Program Evaluation
F – Standards for Awarding Credit
G – Promotion and Advertising of Programs

For more information see: Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists (PDF, 142KB)opens in new window



Explanation of Total Issues by Standard for S21 Programs: B-G

Standard

Issue

Count

B

Unclear role of co-sponsors

4

C

Inadequate learning objectives (e.g., not measurable)

 85

Unclear expertise of instructor

0

D

Insufficient or missing narrative descriptions and/or references

 17

Unclear if program content is appropriate for post-doctoral level or relevant to psychology

26

Inappropriate program for CE (resulting in discontinuation)

0

Lack of content alignment with Criterion D.1

10

Insufficient addressing of limitations

0

E

Inadequate evaluation forms

10

F

Inconsistent listings of CE credits and program hours

8

Further clarification needed - number of psychologists in attendance

3

Further development needed - system/documentation of attendance

8

Further clarification needed - individual CE sessions in multi-session programs not clearly articulated

5

Improper recording of CE programs

2

Further clarification needed- promotional materials indicated available CE but was not listed in Annual Report

7

G

Inappropriate or missing promotional materials 1

84

Inappropriate use of APA logo, icon, or statement of approval

7

Further clarification needed - required information not included on promotional materials

11

Inconsistencies between Annual Report and promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between listed hours)

10

Inconsistencies within promotional materials (e.g., mismatch between learning objectives and title of program)

1

Incorrect language (e.g., "accredit" or "CEU") included in promotional materials

3

Missing or incomplete activity log

1

Further clarification needed - nature of included programs (e.g., missing or unclear program format) 

1

Note. The annual report analysis for Spring 2021 cycle includes additional investigation that reflects a deeper review of the nature (as well as number) of issues by Standard across CE programs for individual reporting cycles. CEU = Continuing Education Units; S21 = Spring 2021.

Last updated: May 2022Date created: 2020

Contact CE Sponsor Approval