Another new APA evaluation guideline focuses on the assessment of family caregivers or care providers, who are an obvious focus of dementia treatment and research. There are numerous interventions geared toward helping them provide good care to their significant others and to themselves. A helpful way to frame this issue is via a coping model developed by Haley and colleagues, which shows a teeter-totter with stressors on one side and resources on the other. If stressors are too high and resources too low, caring for a person with dementia can be hard to sustain. “But having sufficient resources—getting family members to provide more help, hiring paid services, and practicing self-care strategies, for example—can help a great deal,” he said.
As an example of this, NYU Grossman School of Medicine public health practitioner Mary Mittelman, DrPH, along with Haley and other colleagues, created and studied a caregiver intervention that includes six sessions of individual and family counseling, participation in support groups, and individualized phone consultations for each caregiver. Compared with caregivers who did not receive the treatment, those who received it had less depression three years later and were able to delay nursing home placement of their family member by an average of 1.5 years. And even though behavior problems in all the patients with dementia worsened over time, caregivers who received the intervention rated their stressors as lower over time, while controls rated them as higher.
Another set of evidence-based caregiver interventions was developed by geropsychology researcher and University of Washington (UW) professor Linda Teri, PhD, who has taken a unique approach to dementia care. Rather than treating patients and caregivers separately—the modus operandi when she began this work more than 30 years ago—she pioneered the methodology of working with them together, as dyads, families, or communities, depending on the case. Her system and its related interventions, collectively called the Seattle Protocols, have been adapted nationally and internationally and by groups and organizations including nursing homes, the LGBTQ+ community, the VA, and more.
A core feature of her approach is a behavioral analysis called the ABCs (activators, behaviors, and consequences), which helps caregivers understand how their actions or communications might trigger difficult reactions in the person with dementia. “My job is to help [caregivers] understand that there is always a chain, there is always something that triggers the reaction whether you understand it or see it or not,” she said. Another aspect of the model is having patients with dementia identify activities that are pleasurable for them and that their caregivers deem are accessible, affordable, and easy to implement. If a person living with dementia fondly recalls spending time in Hawaii, for instance, bringing out old photographs and stories from those times can be a way to encourage and share those pleasant memories, Teri explained.
Over time, Teri observed something else: Caregivers were more likely to engage in an item on the patient’s list if they enjoyed doing it themselves. She also showed that when the event was something they both liked to do, both of their moods improved. “A lot of times it’s really about figuring out what is happening in the interaction now, what are the good pieces of it, and then taking those good pieces and figuring out how to maximize them and make them easier,” she said. (Teri, L., & Uomoto, J. M., Clinical Gerontologist, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1991opens in new window).
All these insights have been woven into a framework that is being used in several different contexts. An example is the RDAD (Reducing Disabilities in Alzheimer’s Disease) program, which uses a combination of exercise and “pleasant events” individualized to patient preferences—for example, simple crossword puzzles for a patient who loved tackling tough puzzles, or easy sewing projects for a former seamstress—to help reduce physical disability in Alzheimer’s patients. This is a key intervention because falls and other injuries can be devastating to these patients: If they end up in a hospital or rehab setting, the stress of trying to adjust to an unfamiliar environment can exacerbate their condition, as can the frustration of trying to follow rehab instructions (see Teri, L., et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 290, No. 15, 2003opens in new window).
Teri and colleagues have also developed successful programs under variants of the acronym STAR (Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences) that use this methodology to train nursing home staff, home-based caregivers, and VA staff who work with veterans who have dementia. An online version of the STAR protocol is now being tested in a clinical trial funded by the National Institute on Aging, with preliminary results showing it helps to reduce caregiver burden (Lindauer, A., et al., Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2019opens in new window).
Other groups are adapting these programs as well. For instance, Karen I. Fredriksen Goldsen, PhD, a professor in the University of Washington School of Social Work, is tailoring specific components of RDAD for the aging LGBTQ+ population, taking into account that their family structures are often nontraditional and that dementia adds one more area of perceived “difference” or “weakness” in a community that is already marginalized and stigmatized. Meanwhile, community programs in the United States, Europe, and Asia are also adopting versions of these programs, and they have been translated into Spanish, Italian, Chinese, and Japanese.
Caregivers may also benefit from mindfulness interventions, shown to reduce caregiver depression and enhance subjective well-being, according to a meta-analysis of 131 randomized controlled trials of caregiver interventions. The analysis also found that caregivers benefited from educational programs with psychotherapeutic components, from psychotherapy, and from multicomponent therapy such as Teri’s interventions (Cheng, S., et al., Psychology and Aging, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2020opens in new window).