One of the top priorities among cannabis researchers is clarifying how the drug—which has been legalized for recreational use in 21 states and for medical use in 37 states—affects the developing brain. “I’m concerned by the increase in the number of people who are using cannabis at higher doses on a daily basis,” said Nora Volkow, MD, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). “Adolescents are more vulnerable to addiction, and once they are using compulsively, cannabis can interfere with memory and learning.” In one study, 15% of people of all ages who used cannabis in the past 30 days met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria for cannabis use disorder, and rates specifically among youth ages 12 to 20 were significantly higher at 23% (Richter, L., et al., The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2017opens in new window).
To investigate the effects of cannabis use on adolescents, Joanna Jacobus, PhD, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of California San Diego (UCSD), launched longitudinal studies that followed teenagers who had started using and compared them with nonusing controls. Adolescents who continued using for 3 years at least 2 times per week had thicker cerebral cortices, particularly in the frontal and parietal regions than controls (Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 16, 2015opens in new window). The cannabis users performed more poorly on cognitive tests, especially in attention and memory tasks, and teenagers who started using earlier in life performed more poorly than those who started using later or nonusers (Neuropsychology, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2015opens in new window).
More recently, Jacobus began collecting data on youth before they started using cannabis to understand if the drug caused the poorer neural health outcomes, or if there were preexisting biological brain differences that were also influencing cognitive outcomes. A 6-year study showed preexisting differences in gray matter and functional brain activation that could be contributing to poorer cognitive performance in adolescent cannabis users. “We found that there are biological brain differences that can increase the chances that an adolescent will start using cannabis, and these differences may also increase their vulnerability to negative developmental outcomes,” said Jacobus.
Jacobus is optimistic that there will be more data soon about which youth are at higher risk of initiating cannabis use as researchers follow more than 11,000 youth enrolled in the NIH’s ABCD Study, the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the United States. The study began in 2015 when children were 9 or 10, and Jacobus and her colleagues are collecting data on 700 participants from San Diego County with tools such as MRI imaging, cognitive and genetic marker testing, and questionnaires about family environment, school activities, and more.
Like Jacobus, Jonathan Schaefer, PhD, a researcher in the psychology department at the University of Minnesota, was eager to explore the cause of emotional and cognitive problems among adolescents who used cannabis. He tapped into data collected from more than 3,000 twins who had been followed from adolescence into their early 30s. By comparing identical twins who shared genetics and a home environment, he could better separate the effects of cannabis use on negative outcomes from the effects of these background factors.
He did not find evidence that cannabis caused more mental health problems or decreased cognitive ability, but the drug was linked to lower educational attainment, occupational status, and income (PNAS, Vol. 118, No. 14, 2021opens in new window). In a subsequent exploratory analysis, the data revealed that in identical twins, the twins who used more cannabis than their cotwins also had lower GPAs and academic motivation. “Our findings provide evidence against the idea that cannabis has dramatic, long-lasting effects on the brain,” Schaefer said. “Instead, they raise the possibility that we should be more concerned about acute, shorter-term drug effects that have lingering consequences.” For example, students who are using cannabis regularly may have trouble focusing and feeling motivated during school, which might ultimately affect their educational and career trajectory. Schaefer cautions that even if cannabis does not cause permanent, deleterious changes in the brain, it is still risky for adolescents to use because it may negatively impact other important longer-term life outcomes, such as educational attainment, risk of developing a cannabis use disorder, and lung health. These findings were also based on twins who were using in the 1990s and early 2000s, so the results do not account for the effects of newer, high-potency products, Schaefer said.
Data collected from more than 1,000 New Zealanders over 4 decades has also given researchers a glimpse into how frequent, long-term cannabis use—often starting in the teen years—affects the aging process. The study participants were followed from birth to age 45, and the long-term users were less financially prepared for aging, with lower credit scores and less money in savings and investments. They also reported more social problems, such as loneliness, lower life satisfaction, and less social support (The Lancet: Healthy Longevity, Vol. 3, No. 10, 2022opens in new window).
“Social support and financial preparedness in midlife are related to better aging and longer lives,” said Madeline Meier, PhD, an associate professor of psychology at Arizona State University and author of the study. “People may not realize that if they become dependent on cannabis, there could be consequences for healthy aging and well-being.” The researchers investigated whether factors in childhood—like IQ, low self-control, or socioeconomic status—could explain the outcomes, but they did not find evidence for this in the study. Long-term cannabis users frequently developed dependence on other substances, such as alcohol and tobacco, and the polysubstance use could also be contributing to at least some of the financial and social problems in midlife, Meier said.