Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in young people are a major public health problem worldwide, and their prevalence keeps rising.
Schools and universities are ideal environments in which to implement interventions addressing the problem of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in young people. A systematic review and network meta-analysis by Kiran et al., published in Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, examined the effectiveness of various interventions developed to reduce STBs and improve suicide prevention skills among young people, their peers, their guardians, and teachers in educational settings.
The authors searched Medline, APA PsycInfo, and CENTRAL up to April 2021 to find quantitative intervention studies with control groups involving young people 12 to 25 years old. They identified 49 studies involving 42,039 participants.
Interventions were categorized as universal (targeting all participants) or selective (targeting high-risk participants). Universal interventions were associated with an almost twofold reduction in the odds of STBs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.43, 2.38]). Both selective interventions (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.51, 95% CI [0.32, 0.70]) and universal interventions (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.26, 0.54]) moderately increased suicide prevention competencies.
In terms of content, education and awareness programs (OR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.23, 2.04]) and psychotherapy programs (OR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.25, 3.33]) led to a 1.5- to twofold reduction in the odds of STBs. Gatekeeper universal interventions (SMD = 1.04, 95% CI [0.73, 1.34]) led to large increases in suicide prevention skills compared with no treatment. Education and awareness interventions led to modest improvements in suicide prevention skills (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.12, 0.44]) compared with no treatment.
The study findings align with the findings of previous high-quality trials in the field. However, the low quality of most of the studies included in the meta-analysis suggests that the conclusions should be interpreted and applied with caution, especially in settings lacking large, high-quality clinical trials, such as low- and middle-income countries.
The findings of this study provide clear and informative messages for policymakers. On the basis of the study results, the authors recommend the wide implementation of universal mental health and suicide awareness training as a first-line preventive strategy in schools and educational settings.
Selective and intensive interventions are promising under certain circumstances. Intensive psychotherapeutic programs appear to be more suitable for students who previously engaged with STBs. Gatekeeper training programs hold promise for equipping students, peers, and educators with essential skills to recognize and respond to suicide risks.

