skip to main content
Special Issue

New Data on Head-to-Head Comparisons of DSM-5 Association Section II vs. Section III

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
September 2024
(Vol.15, No.5)
ISBN:
978-1-4338-9807-5
Item #
5951507
Format
PDF

Special Issue PDF
$24.95

APA Style leaf logo Cite This Webpage in APA Style
American Psychological Association. (2024). New Data on Head-to-Head Comparisons of DSM-5 Association Section II vs. Section III. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/per/per-new-data-comparisons

Special Issue Editors

Table of contents

View the table of contents with abstracts on APA PsycNET

Introduction

Articles

  • Predicting Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Suicidal Risk: A Comparison Between the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Section II Personality Disorder and Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Dimensions
    Antonella Somma, Giulia Gialdi, Robert F. Krueger, Kristian E. Markon, and Andrea Fossati
  • Personality Pathology in Youth: A Comparison of the Categorical and Alternative Model in Relation to Internalizing and Externalizing Pathology and Age-Adequate Psychosocial Functioning
    Christel J. Hessels, Elisabeth L. de Moor, Marike H. F. Deutz, Odilia M. Laceulle, and Marcel A. G. Van Aken
  • Exploring Personality Correlates of Psychiatric Hospitalization: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Section II Personality Disorder Model and Alternative Model for Personality Disorders
    Dominika Górska and Monika Olga Jańczak
  • Comparing the DSM-5 Categorical Model of Personality Disorders and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Regarding Clinician Judgments of Risk and Outcome
    Joseph Maffly-Kipp and Leslie C. Morey
  • A Comparison of the Associations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section II Personality Disorders and Section III Personality Domains With Clinical Dysfunction in a Psychiatric Patient Sample
    R. Michael Bagby, Sharlane C. L. Lau, Carolyn A. Watters, Lena C. Quilty, and Martin Sellbom
  • Perception of Stigma Across Diagnostic Models of Personality Pathology
    Katherine E. Hein, Shakur J. Dennis, Logan F. Folger, and Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt
  • Longitudinal Prediction of Psychosocial Functioning Outcomes: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Section-II Personality Disorders Versus Alternative Model Personality Dysfunction and Traits
    Lee Anna Clark, Eunyoe Ro, Jeffrey R. Vittengl, and Robin B. Jarrett
  • Different Routes to the Same Destination? Comparing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Section II- and Alternative Model of Personality Disorder-Defined Borderline Personality Disorder
    Alexandra Hines, Madeline L. Kushner, Nicole Stumpp, Stephen Semcho, Eric Bridges, Hannah Croom, Abrar Rahman, Sarah Cecil, Caden Maynard, Matthew W. Southward, Thomas A. Widiger, and Shannon Sauer-Zavala
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Personality Disorders and the Alternative Model: Prediction of Naturalistically Observed Behavior, Interpersonal Functioning, and Psychiatric Symptoms, 1 Year Later
    William R. Calabrese, Leah T. Emery, Chloe M. Evans, and Leonard J. Simms
  • Comparing the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Personality Disorder Models Scored From the Same Interview
    Whitney R. Ringwald, William C. Woods, and Aidan G. C. Wright
  • Prospective Prediction of Treatment Outcomes in Adolescents: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Alternative Model for Personality Disorder Versus Borderline Personality Disorder
    Carla Sharp, Paulina Kulesz, and Sophie Kerr
  • Comparing the Clinical Utility of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders to the Section II Personality Disorder Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Laura C. Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut, Hilde De Saeger, and Jan H. Kamphuis

* Each issue of Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment will honor one paper per issue as an “Editor’s Choice” article. The choice is based on the article’s potential impact on the study of personality pathology.