Functional fixedness would suggest that we would use the APA Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major: Version 3.0 (Guidelines 3.0) as a set of performance expectations for psychology students graduating with an undergraduate psychology degree, and that would be the extent of their use. We could use Guidelines 3.0 to help us write outcomes for our respective undergraduate psychology programs, put them on a shelf, and hope our classes achieve the desired results. However, if we do that, we are missing an opportunity to infuse all of our classes with the rich information included in the guidelines. In order to achieve the outcomes we desire, we need to make sure our classes are providing the instructional methods needed for students to build the skills and abilities the guidelines suggest they should have at the end of our bachelor’s degree programs.
Introduction to psychology is a course that is typically required for psychology majors. In addition, many non-majors also take the course. Students may take this course in high school as an AP course or a dual-enrollment course, or they may take it at a community college, a 4-year college, or a university. Though there are many different places a student may take this introductory psychology course, the course taken in these different institutions may serve as the first psychology course for a psychology major, and thus should be moving students toward the desired major outcomes.
While the committee charged with writing Guidelines 3.0 did not specifically target the introductory psychology course, there is much information in the guidelines that can be used when teaching this course.
The Guidelines 3.0 document includes foundation indicators, which can be used in course design for introductory courses, and baccalaureate indicators, which can be used in course design for upper-level courses. Because the foundation indicators are particularly useful for introductory psychology, they are the focus here. For example, Goal 1: Content Knowledge and Applications, specifically lists several outcomes and foundation indicators that can be achieved in an introductory psychology course. Below is one example:
1.1 Describe key concepts, principles, and theories in psychological science
1.1a Use basic psychological principles to describe or explain behavior
1.1b Recognize that simple explanations rarely explain behavior adequately
1.1c Provide examples in which the sociocultural context has affected research findings
1.1d Explain why psychology is science
1.1e Explain why psychology is a hub science
All of the above can be explored in an introductory psychology course, and by doing so, we begin the students on a path that can lead to achieving the foundation indicators during the first two years of their college experience. This will also serve to facilitate a deeper exploration of this outcome in upper-level psychology courses where the baccalaureate outcomes and indicators will be addressed.
I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the fact that APA has more specifically addressed the introductory psychology course through the APA Introductory Psychology Initiative (IPI). The IPI generated, among other things, a set of student learning outcomes for the introductory courseopens in new window and a list of integrative themes that provide a framework for organizing course material. The table below shows how the integrative themes, student learning outcomes, and sample concepts or ideas from the APA IPI are consistent with the foundation indicators in the guidelines document using goals 2 and 3 as examples.


Ladonna Lewis, PhD, is a psychology faculty member and the director of the honors program at Glendale Community College in Glendale, Arizona. Ladonna has been teaching the introductory psychology course for over 28 years. Ladonna has demonstrated a dedication to students that has resulted in being recognized with several teaching awards, including Teacher of the Year from Mesa Community College in 2002, the NISOD Excellence Award and Glendale Community College Excellence in Teaching award in 2014, and the Honors Professor of the Year award in 2017–2018. Ladonna was a member of the APA Board of Educational Affairs Task Force on Psychology Major Competencies, which produced Guidelines 3.0.