Q1: What concrete steps should APA take to enhance its science agenda, including recognition of psychology as a STEM discipline and communication of the science of psychology? How will you convey to government funding agencies, professional associations and the public that psychology is a STEM discipline?
The belief that psychology is not a STEM discipline is antiquated and incorrect. We are trained in and implement sophisticated scientific approaches through the use of technologically and mathematically advanced methodologies. Through educational outreach, APA should inform the public, professionals and government funding agencies in an explicit and transparent fashion about contemporary psychology. As a discipline, psychology would not exist or be maintained without STEM education. The understanding of psychology as a STEM discipline will also be furthered by collective partnerships within our own discipline and across other STEM professions. Following these initiatives, we will place psychology where it belongs.
Q2: What are your ideas as to how APA can take a leadership role in health-care reform and ensure the inclusion of psychologists in these reforms?
For far too long, psychology has been isolated as a mental health profession. APA should be a leader in health-care reform by helping move from traditional, silo-based care to collaborative models while still supporting traditional psychotherapeutic and assessment services. The role of behavior in controlling disease and enhancing wellness naturally positions psychologists and psychological services at the forefront of modern-day health care. Parity should be shifted from concept to reality by including psychologists in the definition of physician in the Medicare system. Recognition and parity are paramount. We must lead and be recognized. It is time for psychology.