Q5: What concrete steps should APA take to enhance its science agenda (e.g., recognition of psychology as a STEM discipline; communication of the science of psychology)?
Taking a developmental approach to enhance APA’s science agenda would be my choice. APA’s co-sponsoring of science fairs at science museums on an annual basis would make its STEM status known by current schoolchildren and adolescents. They would not need to be persuaded, it would just be a fact for them. Encouraging college students to work on research teams with professors and to present posters at the regional psychological association meetings would highlight the link in college. And finally, research psychologists presenting with other scientists both at APA and other scientific meetings would be a living reminder of this status.
Q6: What is your vision for APA’s role in the global psychology community? How are you planning to further APA’s relationships in an international context?
The global psychology community is very present. I envision moving APA toward increased collaboration with international organizations in the areas of education, training and research. Such efforts are underway as illustrated in the May-June 2016 American Psychologist list of conferences: eight national and 47 international. I will encourage divisions with international projects to provide travel grants to advanced graduate students and ECPs, supporting their attendance at international conferences. Announcements in international psychology blogs and lists would invite overseas students and ECPs to attend and present at the APA Annual Convention. An international perspective can and should become the norm.