Q5: What concrete steps should APA take to enhance its science agenda (e.g., recognition of psychology as a STEM discipline; communication of the science of psychology)?
First, psychology needs to be perceived as a STEM science. To do so, we should continue the Science Leadership meetings with invitations to individuals at the National Science Foundation and the National Academies of Science. Second, publicizing the integration of science and practice should be the first priority of our public relations staff; that way we are enhancing psychology the way medicine does with snapshots of recent medical research with implications for practice. Journal editors should feed possible announcements to appropriate APA officials for publicity. Finally, the importance of science needs to be recognized in all undergraduate and graduate curricula.
Q6: What is your vision for APA’s role in the global psychology community? How are you planning to further APA’s relationships in an international context?
I am committed to and have attended international psychology meetings for over 20 years and currently serve as president-elect in two such associations. APA’s role in international psychology science and practice is critical to our future. International standards for psychological practice are beginning and APA must continue to participate in them. We must extend our reach to more international settings and associations, recognizing cultural and societal differences and that America is just one country, not the world’s self-proclaimed psychology leader. International groups generally see a one-country, one-vote approach, to which we must conform and listen as well as speak.