All commentaries must be authored by a psychologist in training, such as a graduate student or postdoctoral scholar, with preference for a graduate student or postdoctoral scholar in the first-author role. Commentaries authored by multiple individuals, including more than one psychologist in training, are encouraged.
Commentaries are critical evaluations of an article’s translational impact rather than critiques of the authors or of specific arguments made in the original paper. Commentaries should not simply summarize the target article. Instead, they should make an original, evidence-supported contribution that helps readers understand the article’s implications for public interest, practice, policy, psychological science, or audiences beyond the immediate research area.
Want to ACE your commentary submission? Strong commentaries do one of the following:
- Add theoretical perspective not fully considered in the target article and explain how that perspective changes or deepens the translational implications of the work.
- Contrast the target article’s central argument or implications with previously published empirical or theoretical evidence, clarifying what the broader literature suggests about the article’s translational claims.
- Extend the discussion of the target article to new dimensions for future research or application, such as new populations, contexts, mechanisms, methods, interventions, policy settings, or implementation challenges.
Commentaries that extend the discussion to future research or application must do more than identify a general direction for future work. They should provide specific examples and detailed, appropriate citations to support the new contribution. For example, a commentary might explain how the target article’s findings could inform research with a particular population, be applied in a specific practice or policy context, or raise new questions about measurement, implementation, equity, development, or intervention design. These extensions should be grounded in the existing literature and should clearly show how the commentary adds to the translational value of the original article.